Posts Tagged ‘Movies’

5 Most Worrying Remakes In Production

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

5-most-worrying-remakes-in-production

Lately I’ve been following with a growing concern the new remake (or reboot, as it’s been dubbed nowadays) frenzy that has gotten a good grip of Hollywood. And I can see why! The remakes are a nice way to sell same old shit to the same old audience and make them believe they’ve just had something fresh. For a producer it’s a jackpot – a franchise that’s already there, and you don’t even have to come up with a new story for chrissake, why not use the same one that worked 20 years ago, there’s no reason it wouldn’t work again!

Here’s a list of the most worrying remakes that are coming your way in the next couple of years… I try not to be too skeptic, and try to keep my mind open, but really…

5-totalrecall

TOTAL RECALL
To be honest, I’m not too worried about remaking Total Recall (1990) – as we know, the original film wasn’t actually the brightest work of art out there, although directed by Paul Verhoeven. But why? Isn’t there anything better to do? Philip K. Dick has a lot of very good novels that just scream to be filmed, and you stick with the worn-out ones. Anyways, I’m intrigued to see the eye-popping scene – Arnold‘s portrayal is burned into my brains, and they’re more than welcome to try to erase it.

Total Recall (Remake), produced by Neal H. Moritz (Fast & Furious -saga, I Am Legend, xXx‘s) & his company Original Films (how ironic is that?) for Columbia Pictures. Penned by Kurt Wimmer (The Thomas Crown Affair, Ultraviolet). No director attached AFAIK.

4-predator

PREDATORS
Monster hunting in the jungle without the good ol’ Governator. Another legendary Arnie flick that’s to be remade – yet this time, it’s going to be produced by Robert Rodriguez, the wobbly Texan, who might or might not nail it, depending who he’ll pick as the director. The thing that really worries me the most, though, is the cast – so far, it has been rumored that John Cena will be playing the role of Major Dutch, originally portrayed by Arnold Schwarzenegger. Not to say that Cena would be remarkably worse actor than Arnie, but definitively he’s no better… Oh, and Kelly Clarkson, too… So, we’ll see what’ll happen, but this smells like a big-ass catastrophe for both Rodriguez and Predator. The pitch for Predators says it all:

“In the reboot a team of commandoes face down a mysterious race of vicious monsters.”

Well, good luck to you.

Predators, produced by Robert Rodriguez (Grindhouse, From Dusk Till Dawn, Desperado), starring John Cena (rumoured, 12 Rounds, Marine) and Kelly Clarkson (rumored as well).

3-hellraiser

HELLRAISER (2011)
Hellraiser could actually benefit from a good remake. I mean, yes, the original Hellraiser is one of the most terrifying horror films out there and I couldn’t have asked anything more back in the 80′s, but now – to be honest – it’s a tad outdated. Not maybe in a bad way, but I’d say there’s a lot of material to be re-made.

The thing that worries me the most with the Hellraiser remake is the fact that for some reason they introduce an intriguing director after another to the project, and eventually everyone ends up leaving it. Last one in the long line of directors who’ve walked away from the fires of hell is Pascal Laugier, the director of the most shocking horror film of this century – Martyrs.

It smells like there’s something rotten in the production, and I just hope the writer/producer Clive Barker won’t be dragging it to the screen eventually.

Hellraiser (Remake), written and produced by Clive Barker for Dimension Films, no director attached ATM AFAIK, but supposed to be released in 2011.

2-lettherightonein

LET THE RIGHT ONE IN LET ME IN (2010)
One of the best films coming from Sweden since the golden age of Ingmar Bergman, Let The Right One In, is going to go through the royal Hollywood treatment and get remade by director Matt Reeves (Cloverfield), and produced by JJ Abrams.

I have to say that although I have nothing specific against Cloverfield or JJ Abrams in general, I just don’t see the match for this film. JJ is known from big special effect action films, and Cloverfield was definitively not celebrated because of it’s strong performances, great story and heart-aching intensity.

Let Me In, directed by Matt Reeves and produced by JJ Abrams, supposedly coming out in 2010.

1-alien

ALIEN
If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it – an old proverb that just doesn’t apply in Hollywood. No matter how great a film you have, there’s no stopping once the producers enter the remake/reboot/redux/sequel spree – and with Alien, it’s really gonna hurt. I just can’t see one reason other than “yeah we’d like to see that in 3D” that Alien was to be remade – or rebooted – and whatever they’ll do with it, it’ll never peak the original one. I know, I sound a bit religious here, but it’s fucking Alien, you don’t mess up with it, understood? It’s like remaking 2001! Or Solyaris! (Hey… wait…).

Alien (Remake), produced by Ridley Scott and directed by Carl Rinsch.

- Timo

Top 10 Directorial Debuts of All Time

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

top10directorialdebutsofalltime

I was watching this film the other day called Lars and the Real Girl, a story about a man who falls in love with a doll. It´s directed by Craig Gillespie and it was his directorial debut feature film. I thought it was a great movie, especially for a first time director. Also I´m eagerly anticipating Duncan Jones´s debut feature film Moon (although I´m guessing it won´t be coming to cinemas near you any time soon…). A few days ago I started thinking about other great debut feature films and this list is what I came up with.

donniedarkoDONNIE DARKO directed by Richard Kelly

Donnie Darko reached cult status almost instantly when it came out. And why not, it is a brilliant film. But I have sometimes wondered if Richard Kelly just got really lucky with Donnie Darko… If you compare Donnie Darko to his second feature, Southland Tales, the difference could be measured in light years. Never the less Richard Kelly is definitely one of the most interesting film makers today and hopefully he will get his shit together in his next movie. Donnie Darko also made Jake Gyllenhaal the star he is today.

kidsKIDS directed by Larry Clark

For me Kids is still one of the best movies ever made about teenagers. Oh man, those kids still give me the creeps. Director Larry Clark has made a career telling stories about young people and their problems. Usually quite disturbingly. He has never been afraid to handle touchy subjects and no tabu is too tabu for him. Still I believe Kids is his best work to date.

amoresperrosAMORES PERROS directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu

Amores Perros is the perfect debut film for a non english speaking film maker. It is not easy to break to the international market, I can tell you that. But in order to do that, you need an exceptional movie that is so good it doesn´t matter what language is spoken. For the record I don´t have a problem with subtitles or anything like that, I´m just saying this in general. Amores Perros has a complex story and huge ensemble cast, but it stays in control trough out the film. Not bad a for first movie. After Amores Perros director Iñárritu went on to doing english language films like 21 Grams and Babel.

eraserhead2ERASERHEAD directed by David Lynch

David Lynch really fought to get this film made and a good thing he did. In addition to his grand he got from school, Lynch used money from friends and family and he even took a paper route to finish it. As you know the end result looks amazing and it feels like watching a beautiful, but surreal nightmare. You can really see his ambition and hard work in the movie and it most definitely paid out.  He has had an amazing career always staying true to his roots and his own vision. There is no questing about it, that Lynch is one of the only true visionaries of our time.

piPI directed by Darren Aronofsky

Darren Aronofsky won a bunch of awards with his debut film Pi. He then went on doing a movie called Requiem for a Dream which was also very pressing much like Pi. After these two movies people thought they knew Aronofsky as this fast cut editing visual genius, but as it turns out he had a much bigger range of impressing himself trough his lens. The Fountain wasn´t very well received, but I think it was amazing. The Wrestler was also a very different film compared to the others (in my opinion it was Aronofsky best work to date). So I can´t wait to see how a remake of the classic RoboCop molds in his hands.

beingjohnmalkovichBEING JOHN MALKOVICH directed by Spike Jonze

Being John Malkovich is actually one of my favorite movies ever. It is a flawless combination of the perfect script (written by Charlie Kaufman) and a visionary director. Jonze and Kaufman have also collaborated on Adaptation. Like you may have noticed we here at Zombie Room are also super psyched about  his newest work Where the Wild Things Are. Check out our posts on the subject here and here.

reservoirdogsRESERVOIR DOGS directed by Quentin Tarantino

When Reservoir Dogs came out it was clear that it wouldn´t be the last we hear from director Tarantino. The movie portrays what happens before and after a jewel heist gone seriously bad, but not the heist itself. At that time I thought no one could top a movie like that, but then only two years later along came Pulp Fiction and Tarantino became a household name. Not easy for a director by the way. Now I´m eagerly anticipating his new nazi epic Inglourious Basterds.

americanbeautyAMERICAN BEAUTY directed by Sam Mendes

Sam Mendes instantly became one of the top directors in the world with his debut feature American Beauty. This was actually also the writing debut for screenwriter Alan Ball. Hopefully they will collaborate again some day. Mendes has directed four feature films now and all of them are very good. American Beauty is still his best work, although Revolutionary Road came pretty damn close.

lesquatrecentscoupsLES QUATRE CENTS COUPS directed by François Truffaut

Les quatre cents coups (The 400 Blows) is one of the defining films of the French New Wave and it displays many of the characteristics of the movement. It is a semi-autobiographical film, reflecting events of Truffaut’s and his friend’s lives. The English title is a straight translation of the French one, but it misses its meaning, as the French title refers to the expression “faire les quatre cents coups”, which means “to raise hell”.

citizen-kaneCITIZEN KANE directed by Orson Welles

It was crystal clear for me who would get 1st place on this list. Citizen Kane is voted best movie of all time I don´t know how many times and it still is one of the greatest stories ever told. It was nominated for an Academy Award in nine categories, but won only for Best Original Screenplay (by Herman Mankiewicz and Welles). Although Orson Welles went on having a great career, this film is the one he will always be remembered from.

WHO DIDN´T MAKE THE CUT…

I also want to give credit to a few more great debut films that didn´t quite fit into the list, but are true movie gems.

CONTROL directed by Anton Corbijn

CLERKS. directed by Kevin Smith

SYNEGDONE, NEW YORK directed by Charlie Kaufman

IN BRUGES directed by Martin McDonagh

LARS AND THE REAL GIRL directed by Craig Gillespie

THE STRANGERS directed by Bryan Bertino

There are of course many many more great debuts out there, but I had to choose 10, so I´m sticking with them. If you think I have left something important out, I would love to hear your opinions.

- Essi

Top 5 David Lynch films

Sunday, April 12th, 2009

David Lynch hasn’t done one bad film. I want to mention this, because it’s easy to think of Dune as a failboat of a scifi film, which it was at some level, but still kicks ass compared to most of the science fiction films out there anyway, so fuck you if you don’t like Dune, it’s a great film. But not one of the best by Lynch. But neither is  Blue Velvet, no matter how much some people rave about it. Here’s my personal top-5 by Lynch, while waiting to hear more from his next films.

twinpeaksLaura Palmer was definitively one of my teenage fantasies…

The prequel-feature to the ever-famous Twin Peaks -TV-series is by far Lynch’s most underrated and hated film, but the one I’m quite easily placing as Lynch’s best work. Why? Well, it smashes together faces like David Bowie, Jack Bauer, Chris Isaak and Harry Dean Stanton – not to mention the original Twin Peaks cast led by wonderful Ray Wise – adds in a wonderful soundtrack by Angelo Badalamenti, and lets it slowly boil under Lynch’s unique directoral vision. When served, it’s an unforgettable, multi-layered beautiful film with the aura of mystery around it only Lynch can create.

But what makes the film really to stand out is the naive, a bit “amateurish” filmmaking on many of the scenes, which I personally believe to be the thing that nailed Lynch from being just another strange filmmaker into a real nerd-filmmaker god. Times film critic Vincent Canby said it quite well when writing about the film: “It’s not the worst movie ever made; it just seems to be”. Quite right, Vincent! Every now and then it seems like it’s been made by some fucked-up film school kid working on his “great masterpiece of a degree work”, but unlike these kids, every scene Lynch embarks on, regardless on how naive and purposefully strange it might smell like, he’s able to nail it. And this – I believe – travels across to the minds of aspiring filmmakers in the form of “I love this and I could do this”, and results in inspiring thousands of young filmmakers, but the flipside being the endless Lynch ripoffs that never rise anywhere close to what Lynch has been able to capture.

mulhollandHot chicks kissing. Win.

Mulholland Drive
has been considered quite widely as Lynch’s best work, and I’m no man denying it on a more general and filmatic level. I think Mulholland Drive “professionalizes” much of the stylistic things Lynch has tried out before, for example in Lost Highway, and polishes his storytelling to the maximum. I’m not sure if we’ll ever see a feature film so “straightforward” from Lynch again, or if this was it for him, but if it was, it was a perfect one for that.

Also included very hot lesbian action and the best scene in the history of cinema, the Winkie’s Dream scene.


The burnt-face hobo rastafari scares me shitless every time… But really, it’s the Oscar-worthy development of the whole scene that really does it.

inland

One of the scariest moments of the film was this frame.

Three most important things in Lynch’s by far strangest film for me are the crap-quality digital cam look of the whole film, the rabbits (of course), and the grim Polish gateways and stairwells. I’ve been able to finish this film just once, and after the experience I was completely blown away. I tried the second time, but dropped out somewhere in the middle. Because of this, I wasn’t sure if the film should be actually the best of Lynch so far, or on this list at all – so I decided to drop it somewhere in between.

INLAND is a combination of awesome, haunting and very Lynchian scenes, that don’t quite connect – but they don’t actually need to. I was going through the plot on Wikipedia, and looking at it in this format made a bit more sense than when whatching the film, because what Lynch has always mastered very well is the atmosphere that really grabs you by the balls, and you forget to worry about the overall plot. But there definitively seems to be one in there, and it has a lot to do with east European girls, a woman in trouble and rabbits.

INLAND is an unforgettable experience, as a film, but also as the post-filmtheater discussion item. Go see it, get blasted and try to interpret it – I think the truth might be somewhere there.

eraserhead

The baby is sick. Very, very sick.

David Lynch started his career as a filmmaker with Eraserhead as his first feature-length film, and what a wonderful film it was. It’s a story of a man on the moon, and a couple who get a baby that’s quite like a fetus of a giant baby parrot.

Although I know I’ll get lynched for saying this, but I think Eraserhead
is Lynch’s very own Star Wreck. He filmed it for over 6 years, and spent about 10k to his own and his friend’s money on it, nobody believed in it, but after it’s release, it became a huge cult hit in the horror genre. Mel Brooks hired Lynch right away after seeing Eraserhead to direct his next feature film -The Elephant Man – which eventually was nominated for 8 Oscars and blasted Lynch into superstardom among directors. Not a bad start for a director, but that’s what it takes many times – you really need to pull the first masterwork out of your ass with completely no money and nobody believing into it, instead of rotting in film schools and crying that nobody wants to fund your film.

Eraserhead has always been for me the film I’d loved to have directed, and I’m still looking forward into doing something similar maybe one day.

elephant

Lovely smile there, mr. Merrick.

So, fresh out of working with the strange and scary DIY-film Eraserhead, Mel Brooks, a comedy filmmaker and producer, hired young and promising David Lynch to direct Elephant Man. The film turned out to be a fantastic, a straightforward but still completely unique drama of a very badly deformed man, Joseph Merrick, also known as Elephant Man. It got 8 Oscar nominations, and won numerous awards, and it’s not a big surprise that a lot of pressure was put on Lynch after the film, and he was suggested to direct Star Wars’ second episode, but instead did Dune, which flopped madly. Nowadays, Hollywood has let go of the hopes on Lynch, and he can roam his own path as much as he wants to, if he gets his stuff financed.

Jennifer Lynch’s “Hisss” reveals the Snake Woman

Friday, April 10th, 2009

On a related topic to this weekend’s Lynchfeast, I wanted to write few words on Lynch’s daughetr Jennifer’s creature-feature in production, called Hisss (Or Nagin) – an USA-India co-production that’s about to hit the theater this year. I was inspired to do this after Fangoria just released the steaming hot pictures of the Snakewoman, portrayed by Mallika Sherawat, a super-hot Bollywood star.

Hisss is Jennifer Lynch’s third feature, and not the most conventional one: it’s said to be a musical/drama, will be shot in India, and it tells the story based on the myth of nāginī, a snake woman. Fangoria’s synopsis of the story is:

HISSS is a modern day retelling of the ancient tale of the ichhadahari nagin (snake woman) and follows a ruthless American, fascinated by the ancient folklore of the mythical creature, who travels to the jungles of India to discover the truth. He finds and captures the nagin’s mate for the magical powers of its nagmani, a mythical gem embedded in its hood. The nagin then transforms into a gorgeous femme fatale and follows him back into the modern world to track down her lover and wreak revenge on his captors and all who stand in the way of their reunion.

I haven’t seen Surveillance yet,  so I don’t know what to expect, but that goes without saying, given the family’s name.

What’s going on with David Lynch?

Friday, April 10th, 2009


It’s hard to talk about David Lynch without sounding like a complete fresh-out-of-filmschool-douchebag about to end up in development hell with your completely ununderstandable 3-hour feature nobody wants to see – not to mention, to fund, but then again, that’s me deep down.

What I love about Lynch’s films is the one thing that annoys and drives away most of the audience: the focus on the atmosphere instead of the story. His work tells me that film can be so much more than just a series of pictures that tell a story of a character or two. It can be a painting where you have to guess parts of the story, maybe stop for a while to just admire some brushstrokes and beautiful details and suddenly find yourself decoding the entirety all over again.

Let’s take a quick look at what Lynch is doing right now. I’m referring to Wikipedia and IMDB mostly (since most of the Lynch websites are quite as informative as his films are easy to follow..), so please excuse me in advance if some of the information is either outdated or wrong.

Lynch’s latest feature film was INLAND EMPIRE (2006), and after that he has completed a deleted scenes/extended storyline of INLAND into a 73-minute film More Things Happened (2007). He has also contributed a segment into a French film called Chacun son cinéma ou Ce petit coup au coeur quand la lumière s’éteing te que le film commence, a “collection of 33 shorts directed by different dierctors about their feeling about cinema”, and did a short film called Boat, about – well, David Lynch on a boat.

Lately, mr. Lynch has also contributed a lot of effort into production of films not by himself. Surveillance (2008) is a film by his daughter Jennifer Lynch, a thriller of sorts, and right now he’s working with Werner Herzog‘s horror drama My Son, My Son, What Have Ye Done (with Willem Dafoe, Udo Kier & Grace Zabriskie in the cast). The film is going to be released next year, and tells a story of a man who starts to experience mysterious things, and ends up killing his mother. Another production on IMDB’s list related to Lynch is called King Shot, a film by Alexandre Jodorowsky with Nick Nolte, Udo Kier and Marilyn Manson (!) on the cast. Lynch has just recently also filmed three commercials for Gucci, and is said to be working on a road documentary too.

Lately Lynch’s main interest has been – at least that’s where he’s been most active about in the public – is a form of meditative thinking called the transcendental meditation, of which he seems to be quite deep in with. He’s been travelling around the world having seminars about the meditation, which he believes can bring the peace to the world. He actually visited here in Finland as well, but frankly, I’m not interested in meditation so I felt that no matter how big a fan I am, I wouldn’t want to take the place of somebody really interested on his current topic and stayed home, watching INLAND EMPIRE instead.

So, the man is still going strong. We just don’t know what exactly is his next, real, feature film going to be. And most certainly, there’s no way trying to guess it – just remember Straight Story. It can be anything.

Tomorrow, a follow-up article Top 5 Lynch Films here on ZR. Stay 2ned.

The Zombies would like to wish you all a great Easter. The Lynch Rabbits are having one, too.

 

- Timo.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine Leaked Online – Good or Bad?

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

wolverine

I have been following the Wolverine scandal very closely ever since it happened. First it was suggested that maybe it was just an April Fools’ joke, but it wasn´t. 20th Century Fox released a statement confirming the leak right after it happened. Everyone at Fox and all the people involved have gone totally ballistic over this and are doing all they can to prevent people from downloading the movie (of course we know there is not that much they can do). The FBI and MPAA are investigating the case. I even got an estimate from someone that because of the leak they will loose approximately 20% of their potential clients due to it. Well I don´t know about that. We here at Zombie Room think a bit differently and I would like to talk about a few things why the leak probably won´t hurt the film as much as the people at Fox are afraid of.

wolverine_origin_xmen_movie

GOOD VS. BAD

First of all I would like to say that I DON´T approve of the leak. I have no intentions of watching the movie anywhere else than in the biggest movie theatre I can find. Now that this is clear, I can also say that don´t approve the contemporary way of distributing films either.  Like I said I haven´t seen the film, but I have heard that the version is in pretty good quality. Never the less, the film is unfinished. According to the press release the film was without many effects and had missing scenes and temporary sound and music. Read the full press release here (I also recommend to read the comments, they are priceless).

It is pretty obvious that most of the people who have downloaded the movie would have done so anyway. The only difference is that now they get to see the movie earlier than usual. As soon as Wolverine hits the cinemas it will be in the internet for download anyway, only then it will be in bad theater cam quality. For me quality and accessibility are everything. I will never watch anything in bad quality and I don´t think anything beats the movie theatre. But I´m sick and tired of having to wait around for the movies that have already been released. Especially when they are just a click away for free.

x-men-origins-wolverine

Hugh is very very angry!!!

In a way I´m happy that this happened because it will be very interesting to see what this leak actually does to the movies success. My guess is that it will be one of the most successful films of the year, if not the most successful. And in fact because of the leak it will get an even bigger audience. And I´m talking Dark Knight success. In fact, X-Men Origins: Wolverine has now been downloaded over a million times. This alone should say something about the interest the public has for this movie. It is actually a compliment to the  movie and if it is any good people will go see it, even after seeing the unfinished version.

I do agree 100% that all movie studios and distributors loose money because of piracy, that´s a fact. But piracy could be wiped out almost completely if the distribution model was to change. People actually want to pay for those downloads, so what´s the problem? 

There is a poll at TorrentFreak where you can give your opinion on the matter. I think the options say it all. There are now 6165 votes counted and the results are pretty clear. You can give your vote here.

x-men-pollMY ANSWER: No, the leak actually got me excited to see it in theater/on DVD.

The zombies are keeping a close eye on this one and hopefully it will finally give the studio executives something to think about.

- Essi

Mutants trailer out.

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

Trailer for French Zombie-film MUTANTS just landed on Twitch Film, and it looks absolutely wonderful. Seems like a pure modern Zombie film – cold, fast-pacing, merciless and right to the point.

I’m A Pirate (So Sue Me)

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

pirates-knocked-up-shrekI’m working for the film industry here in Finland. My salary comes from a company called Energia Productions, a company which gets money through government subsidies (like Finnish Film Foundation) and from the distribution of it’s films, either through distribution companies (they pay a certain % of each unit sold) or through our own resale. Anyway, I get my tummy full every day because people pay me to see or buy my films.

And still, I think the only good guy in the distribution industry is the ”pirate”. I’m talking about the forest fire that sweeps through the vast, old woodland, leaving only ashes behind. Ashes, from where even more healthier industry can be born from. A 15-year old nerd living in his/her’s mom’s apartment and renewing the 100-year old business in between wanking, IRCing and Facebookng. The only asshole not after my money in the industry.

I’m a pirate myself. I started out with music – downloading hudreds of gigs of music from all over the world, getting to know thousands of new bands along my active piracy years. But then, one day, I decided to trash all the illegal music from my harddrive and start buying the music I was in to. The reason wasn’t definitively the sudden strike of conscience, but the fact that I felt uninterested on the music because of the sheer mass of it now flowing slowly to my harddrive. I felt I needed to focus a bit, so I focused on music that I had paid for, and trashed everything else.

All went well, until I found myself in a situation that I didn’t have either enough money or time to worry about my music – I felt that if I wanted to listen to something, I should be able to do it without hesitation. And then, along came Spotify. A service where I just have to pay a yearly 100€ to keep me listening to all the music I could ever want to, and much, much more. So now I’m satisfied, a perfect balance has been found: I have all the music I want to, and somebody else is worrying about getting the stuff to me. I just open the tap, get what I want and as much as I want, and my money goes to the artist. Well, there’s of course the middlemen… But that’s, in the end, the industry’s problem, not mine.

How about movies? I’ve started downloading films via BitTorrent, through such places like Pirate Bay or Mininova actually quite recently. The reason was actually Essi: she re-ignited my interest towards film, flooding me with all the news on interesting productions popping out everywhere around the world and hyping about classics that I should’ve watched a long time ago. Nowadays, I rate my films in three categories:

theater

These are the must-see-as-soon-as-possible-with-the-best-quality-available -films, with either a subject so important to me, or with special effects so special they rock the theater big time. Or films that are very strongly time-related, like the Oscar-nominated ones.

Usually these films are something everyone is hyping about all over the Internet, and waiting for them to land here in Finland is quite frustrating. So, in most cases, I don’t want to wait for them, and just end up downloading a screener, and never go to the theater, just because somebody wants to regulate the territorial rights.

So, because everyone is avoiding the day-and-date releases unless it’s the big-ass film of the year, as well as almost banning the multi-platform releases, film studios lose 80% of my money for not offering what I want, when I want in the format I’d prefer.

dvd

The second category of films are the ones that I don’t need or won’t have the time to go and see in theaters. There are two reasons I’d like to buy them on DVD – the quality and the box. In most cases, I want to watch the film in the best possible quality at home, and very often the BitTorrent version is of a little bit lower quality (and my TV set is so crappy that I can plug into it only through SCART, so at least there the quality is killed). In some cases, I also want to have the copy to my collections, so that I can watch it again at second’s notice. I’m not a big fan of the boxes itself, and more than that, I hate most of the extra material on a DVD, since they are, in most cases, just total, utter, viewer’s-intelligence-despising crap, but having the DVD in my collections – well, there’s some value to it.

But my dilemma is: why to pay 20e of the film, if I just want to watch it once and then forget it? It’s more than in theater, and I’m not fond of the less-than-respectable quality extras anyway. And as I’ve learned personally, the only films that deliver any kind of income to the filmmakers themselves are the full-priced ones, so buying a DVD with 5,99e just get my money to the store-owner, the one person having nothing to do with the film itself.

I don’t even want to go to the flaws of renting a film, but let me just say this: the most preferred way for me would be watch films online. I wouldn’t have to worry about anything – the availability, the heaps of boxes of films I’ll never watch again, the fact I’m paying money for the crappy extras I don’t even want to watch…

I did a little test the other day with Essi. We had a Male Superiority Sunday, when we watched films by Steven Seagal, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Clint Eastwood – and suddenly, we ran out of films to watch. We wanted to see Commando, but didn’t have the copy. Renting was completely out of question – having to walk 3 miles to the nearest rental store wasn’t the thing I wanted to do. So we finally decided to try online rentals.

We are not complete idiots with computers, I’m a bit short-tempered with them, but I get along with different net services quite well, even if they are a bit lame. But we just couldn’t rent a film from any of the five services availble here in Finland we tried. It just was completely impossible.

So, again, money lost. We got frustrated, downloaded what we wanted and watched the film.

torrent

The films that I get via BitTorrent are, in addition to the expections from above, the films that will never travel to Finland, or are classics too hard to find from stores or rental stores… Just some strange, great films from all over the world that I want to see, but would never be able to get from anywhere. I could try Amazon or Play.com, but I’ve decided to boycott those – I just hate browsing for stuff, finding exactly what I want, and then finding out that ”this product can’t be delivered to your country”. Makes me feel like Finland is in some sort of a third-world commercial blockage…

So again, a lot of money lost, and now the so-called ”long tail” gets the hit. The smaller, international filmmakers, the ones that I’d loved to support if possible. And it’s not.

Given these facts, am I a criminal? I would’ve wanted to pay for the films I watch, but it just was completely impossible for me at the level of effort I was willing to put into it.

So it’s like I’m driving a car on a long and lonesome highway, about run out of fuel. I stop by at a gas station, fill the tank, and when going inside to pay, there’s completely nobody, doors are locked and the station is dead because the gas station owner just didn’t feel like coming to work today. I’m not going to just sit around and wait for the owner to show up. If my money is not good for the owner, then I’m off, fuck him.

I don’t believe that digital sharing and distribution of films is piracy, and criminal action as such. It’s just a byproduct of the corporate-controlled industry that’s too slow to adapt, and consumers – the people who LOVE the stuff the corporates are producing – shouldn’t be the ones that take the hit.

EDIT: I just received a funny email, which says:

helpcinema.eu invites you to participate in an online petition against illegal file sharing.

Helpcinema is an initiative taken by European film professionals to collect your reactions regarding the effects of illegal file sharing on the audio-visual industry. This input will be used to give European Members of Parliament a new perspective on the subject.

You can easily participate by answering our three-step questionnaire available here. Your e-mail address will be kept confidential.

If you love cinema and if you have an opinion to share, please show your support and send us your feedback.

So go over to helpcinema.eu and share your thoughts. Not surprisingly, I answered ‘no’ three times.

-Timo

Zombie Room Review: Che (2008)

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

zombieroom_reviewI saw both Che: Part One and Che:Part Two in a row. For me it was important to see them together so I waited for the release of the second one. In this review I will be talking about both films more or less as a one.

The film is directed by Steven Soderbergh. He has an ability to joggle between big budget movies and small indie films without even breaking a sweat. Although he is not the safest bet, Soderberg has done quite a few amazing movies in the past like my absolute favorite Sex, Lies, and Videotape. He has always had a spesific way of telling stories trough his lens, all clearly influenced by cinema of the 70´s. When I went to see Che I was expecting more of the indie qualities to resurface, as they did, but I was blown away on how “arty” the film actually was. No, arty is not the right word, let´s say challenging.

che_1

STORY

The film itself is separated in two parts, each of them being a little over two hours long. In the first part we discover Ernesto “Che” Guevaras earlier years with Fidel Castro and his revolution in Cuba. Set in 1956, Che and a band of Castro-led Cuban exiles mobilize an army to topple the regime of dictator Fulgencio Batista.

The second part is set years later in 1966, when Che has left his family and countrymen in Cuba and gone to Bolivia, to to start another revolution. There he lives his life in disguise. This time the revolutionarys are not that revolutionary and everything goes to hell in the end. The movie is mostly set in forests and it consentrates on showing what being a guerilla or a true revolutionary really means. It basically means little or no food, being on the mercy of the weather and just waiting around in the woods doing nothing, with the ocational gun fights and blowing things up bits.

Che is unique in the sence that there is nothing glamorous about it and it definitely doesn´t glorify the revolutionaries or even the ideals. It just is what it is.The film format itself is very demanding and it doesn´t underestimate the audience, not at all. This I thought was especially good about the movie. After seeing the movie, I felt almost proud of seeing it. The film really made me think about the modern cinema and how easy everything has been made to the audience these days.

1135243851276

CAST & CHARACTERS

Che has an amazing cast and I don´t mean it like it would be packed with Hollywood A-listers. In fact it is the exact opposite. Of course we have the amazing Benicio Del Toro in one the best performances of his life, but other than that the cast is very unkown. Well Matt Damon is in the film for 5 minutes and Franka Potente has a smallish role but that´s it. Demián Bichir is playing Fidel Castro and he is absolutely perfect for the role. Not only is he the spitting image of a young Castro, he is also a great actor and gives an amazing perfomance. You almost feel bad that you don´t get to see him trouhg the whole film. There is not even one bad performances in Che, the casting is just perfect in every possible way.

One of the most interesting directorial choices in the movie was the distance that was kept from the main character Che. You would imagine that a film maker would want to revile some things about the iconic person and bring depth to the charecter, but not Soderberg. I didn´t have that much trouble with this, because I think Soderberg wanted to maintain Ches symbolic and iconic status, much like that famous picture. Only problem with this kind of story telling is that you don´t feel very much emotion, fear or love for your character.

che-movie_357x528

GENERAL BABLE

I spesifically want to give extra credit to Soderberg for doing this movie in the original languages. This almost never happens with American cinema. Everyone speaks English everywhere. Or even worse, they speak english with fake accents. I hate that by the way! I think the only one who has done it succesfully is Steven Spielberg in for example Schindler’s List. People actually have their own languages all over the world, so why not speak them. Most American´s won´t read subtitles and even the notion of something foreing makes them run. Too bad for the rest of the world…

I do have to say that it is a miracle that Soderberg has ever gotten the green light for this project. Don´t get me wrong, I liked it very much, but this movie is NOT for the masses. In fact the film has flopped quite badly everywhere. I´m not surprised. The film is allot to take in, but it is also one of the most interesting ones I´ve seen in while. But I still think it is a damn shame that people don´t seem to be very open for different things.

review-che

CONCLUSION

Negatives:

- Matt Damon (he is in the film only 5 minutes, but still)

- There was something weird in the use of music

- Ok, it was a little boring.

Positives:

- Cast (especially Benicio Del Toro and Demián Bichir)

- Language (all original languages, you don´t see that too often)

- Locations (beautiful and ugly at the same time, felt really genuaine)

- Realism (realism is boring, and so was this film at times, but that is real)

che

Che is a very good movie. It is not your typical biopic, it is raw, honest and demanding. My advice to everyone is to go see the both parts in the same day. I kown allot of people who are still wondering if they shoud go see it, to them I say YES if you want to be challenged to something different and NO if you don´t.

- Essi

Where The Wild Things Are

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Spike Jonze‘s Where The Wild Things Are, a feature film about a boy and a group of strange monsters based on one of the world’s most succesful children book, seems to be shaping up pretty nicely, and the trailer that has just been released – and it looks just absolutely fantastic! I had completely forgotten the whole book on which this one is based upon, a book by Maurice Sednak, with the same name (in Finnish, something horrific like “Hassut hurjat hirviöt“…), but after seeing the first images of this awesome film, I was completely blown away and the rush of nostalgia almost knocked me out.

I’m predicting Where The Wild Things Are to be a remarkable masterpiece, around the same level as Big Fish.

- Timo

Thank you, lord Jonze, for filming us.


Related Posts with Thumbnails