Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

The Oscars 2011 Results, and what we think of them

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

The Oscars have been handed out to their rightful (mostly) owners, and the Zombies made their predictions. This year we didn’t know too much about the films – Essi had seen a good bunch of them, I had only a handful, but compared to last year when we were really, really digging into the bits and pieces of the films, we were really just lost. So much of our predictions were based on something else than really seeing the films – guessing, and trying to make some kind of sense of earlier awards and how the Academy would act like.

Here are our predictions – X is Timo, O is Essi and the yellow with the Oscar on top is obviously the actual winner. As you can see, Essi did much better job than I did – with 15/24 – and I did only 10/24. But next year, the tables will turn.

There’s also a bunch of comments to follow these predictions on the winners and runners up, just under the pic.

LEADING ACTOR – COLIN FIRTH (THE KING’S SPEECH)
I don’t think anybody was hugely surprised by the Leading Actor Oscar going to Colin Firth for his awesome role in The King’s Speech as the stuttering king. He respected the Nr. One Rule of Oscars as stated by Kirk Lazarus from Tropic Thunder: “Never go full retard”. “Everybody knows you never do a full retard.” “What do you mean?” “Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, Rainman, look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Count toothpicks to your cards. Autistic. Sure. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, Forrest Gump. Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and he won a ping-pong competition? That ain’t retarded. You went full retard, man. Never go full retard.” Putting that aside, he did an awesome role, in a don’t-go-full-retard -way: I believed him, but I simultaneously saw the enormous acting effort he did to nail down the role. I wouldn’t know who else could’ve really won this; Bardem and Bridges already have their Oscars, and Eisenberg and even Franco will have another change, unless they botch their careers up. So Colin was also the righteous choice.

SUPPORTING ACTOR – CHRISTIAN BALE (THE FIGHTER)
I don’t know anything about The Fighter, but I know that when Christian Bale sets his mind on something, he can be quite awesome. But still, I don’t like him; he’s a bit creepy. We all know the meltdown he had on set, and it’s been largely inspiration for many people in all fields of life – one of our actresses in Iron Sky actually was listening that little freakout on loop with earphones when preparing for one scene. And since I haven’t seen any other films – other than The King’s Speech, and Geoffrey Rush already has an Oscar, I’m fine with this. The Academy gets my blessing. They may rest peacefully now. I know they’ve been very nervous about this, and been flapping F5 on ZR’s website for hours after the award was handed out, and I didn’t return their calls – they must’ve been frightened to death – but it’s OK. It’s a good decision. Thank you.

LEADING ACTRESS – NATALIE PORTMAN (BLACK SWAN)
It’s amazing how beautiful actresses were nominated this year, and the most beautiful of them all – hell, apart from Essi, Natalie Portman is probably the *most* beautiful woman alive – won the award. Neither of us has seen the film, but the small clips I’ve seen are really strong, so I believe the best one won, although Essi has been appraising The Kids Are Alright also quite a lot. But it was not a competition of whether she would win or not – it was probably one of the safest bets on these Oscars. And for a good reason. And always remember, there’s so many reasons to love Natalie Portman. And, just to state it out loud, one of my biggest dreams as a director is to get to work one day together with Nicole Kidman and Natalie Portman.

SUPPORTING ACTRESS – MELISSA LEO (THE FIGHTER)
Essi picked wisely Melissa Leo, I thought of Amy Adams – just because I think Amy Adams is a lovely actress, but Essi saw the trailer and knew instantly who’s going to win. I did like Helena Bonham Carter’s role, and I think she’s absolutely one to win Oscar one day, but this wasn’t her year. That day will come, and we’ll know it when it hits, she’s a terrific actress, and looks like a billion dollars. If that expression is to say she’s beautiful, mysterious and almost cartoon-like in many ways. So, anyway, the Melissa Leo won this one from the Fighter, and I’m bound to think that The Fighter is a film worth to see.

ANIMATED FEATURE – TOY STORY (PIXAR)
Also known as the Pixar price, and it went – again – to it’s rightful owner, Pixar. I didn’t see any other films, and although I do think that The Illusionist seems like a film worth seeing, there just was no competition to the awesomeness of Toy Story 3. To me, it was the best film of 2010, and I would’ve gladly given the biggest Oscar to that (but of course, that won’t happen anytime soon…). Regardless, that’s a damn fine film, and deserves every Oscar going it’s way. This year we won’t probably see Pixar Oscar, since Cars 2 looks like … well, Cars 2. Probably a fine film, but won’t compete for Oscars (unless they come up with the category of Best Merchandise Sales Oscar), but maybe 2012, when they are pushing out their first live-action film John Carter From Mars… Impossible to say, but I have a tingling sensation that another Best Picture Oscar for Scif might be already on it’s way.

ART DIRECTION – ALICE IN WONDERLAND (ROBERT STROMBERG AND KARIN O’HARA)
Art Direction is basically pulling the vision out of the director’s head and transferring it to the screen into real or CGI sets. A good art director is aware of what the director wants, and when he or she is in synch, their ideas become something extraordinary. Tim Burton has always been very careful with the art directors he’s been working with, and no matter what people say of Alice in Wonderland, it was quite a world of it’s own. This Oscar seems also to be the one where they tuck Harry Potter every year, but I think Inception was a real contestant there. The world of Inception was precise and beautiful as well, especially when the city bended on itself… That was filmmaking, I tell ya.

CINEMATOGRAPHY – INCEPTION (WALLY PFISTER)
Yes, there was a lot of super-high-speed camera in Inception, and the whole cinematography of the complex and multi-layered Inception was very well taken care of, so I think the Oscar went to a right person. He shot most (if not all?) of Christopher Nolan’s films, and always with such excellency, such grandness and such Hollywoodness that one can only admire his work. He’ll be out for quite a bunch of Oscar nominations in his career, that’s for sure.

COSTUME DESIGN – ALICE IN WONDERLAND (COLLEEN ATWOOD)
A two-time Oscar winner Colleen Atwood just nailed the third award from Alice In Wonderland, and that’s no wonder. I did for some reason think that King’s Speech would get it, because I did like the way the film looked like, and like the stuff people were wearing, and it felt like it was very well in period (not to say that I’m an expert in early 1900′s British garderobe, but when things are right, you just know it – that’s the magic of details).

DIRECTING – THE KING’S SPEECH (TOM HOOPER)
The reason we need film directors is because otherwise all the films would be like this. There was quite a formidable bunch of very possible winners, and I think the biggest fight of the Oscars was actually the Directing Oscar this year. Fincher’s been evading evading Oscars from day one, and so has Aronofsky and both absolutely deserve an Oscar, but this time it fell on the lap of Tom Hooper from his astonishing work on The King’s Speech. I do think it went to the right address but I wouldn’t have been at all surprised if it were either of the others. But to be honest, we’ll be seeing Aronofsky and Fincher at Oscars in the years to come, and they’ll get their Oscars and lifetime achievements when they’re old – but with Tom Hooper I can’t be that sure. He’s a tremendous director, but maybe not as prolific as his younger older, more American colleagues.

DOCUMENTARY FEATURE – INSIDE JOB (CHARLES FERGUSON)
I was really, really, really hoping for Banksy to win the Oscar, and I think most of the viewers were as well. Exit through the Gift Shop was quite possibly the best documentary I had seen since… I don’t know when. It wasn’t even a documentary, it was a performance and a statement, which most of the viewers managed to miss completely, and this – I think – was its demise in Oscars. Exit Through the Gift Shop went full retard. Inside Job, on the other hand, seemed to be – as the commentators in Finnish TV pointed out pretty well – a safe bet for American audience. A subject where it’s easy to blame Everyone Else, instead of looking into the mirror. It’s the multi-billionaires, not us. But it was, I really trust, a good documentary. Hope to get to see it one day.

DOCUMENTARY SHORT – STRANGERS NO MORE (KAREN GOODMAN & KIRK SIMON)
We picked the best name for the price, and failed. Really, had no idea about the film at all, just… picked one. That’s all. Nice. Good. Very good.

FILM EDITING – THE SOCIAL NETWORK (KIRK BAXTER, ANGUS WALL)
What is a good edit in a film? The one you pay no attention to, yet the film manages to grab you by the balls and push you around for 2 hours, and you’re all in for it. That’s good editing. It’s not split screens, scattered storytelling or whatever the hell you might think, it’s just about rhythm of the whole film and how to achieve it. The Social Network probably deserves it, but there’s great editors nominated there as well, but I wouldn’t have any real idea what else it could be. Well, I suggested 127 Hours because I don’t know why… It’s kinda hard to say, I’m just starting my editing progress of my film and I think I’m going to be wiser after the next 9 weeks about what is and what is not good editing.

FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM – IN A BETTER WORLD (SUSANNE BIER)
The one thing you can count on Foreign Language Films is that there’s always one film you’ve ever heard of, and that film won’t win it. This is what happened this year as well, but it’s great because the price went to Scandinavia – Denmark! Congratulations! A lot of good things have come from Denmark, so In A Better World is definitely on my list of films I do want to see.

MAKEUP – THE WOLFMAN (RICK BAKER, DAVE ELSEY)
The Wolfman didn’t shine, although it had a good cast, but the makeup was quite natural choice for the Oscars. Werewolf transition is one of the most traditional Hollywood special makeup tricks, and here we see it again, this time using the most modern technology.

ORIGINAL SCORE – THE SOCIAL NETWORK (TRENT REZNOR & ATTICUS ROSS)
To me, the Original Score was the most interesting and game-changing Oscar this year. First, I was hoping it to become a competition between Daft Punk (who did Tron), Social Network and Inception, but unfortunately – and out of no real reason – Daft Punk wasn’t even nominated. But more importantly, Reznor won. The old industrial freak who crafted himself through game soundtracks(Quake), collaborating with such filmmakers as David Lynch and Oliver Stone (Lost Highway and Natural Born Killers’ soundtracks) into an Oscar-winning composer outdid himself, but more than that, it was a brave move from the Academy to give the price to him, when Zimmer had simultaneously released his much more traditional but breathtakingly beautiful Inception… But really, Reznor nailed the score with Brian Enoesque minimalistic precision. But Reznor didn’t work alone – one could say that without the help of Atticus Ross, already a celebrated soundtrack artist (Book of Eli), he couldn’t have succeeded in the first place. I’m terribly happy for this Oscar on so many levels – mainly, because this might be a sign that also we’ll get past the typical soundtrack music in the future more easily, and get to hear more experimental soundtracks also in major films.

ORIGINAL SONG – TOY STORY (RANDY NEWMAN)
As it was tweeted, Randy Newman should accept all the Oscars and give all the speeches in the future. His sovereign, relaxed and ironic approach to the price – this was his 20th Oscar nomination, and second Oscar – was fun and to the point. He noted that above all, the Oscars are supposed to be good TV. And that’s what he delivered. He’s a super-professional, and will probably be popping up at the Oscars in the years to come, and his awesome song for Toy Story 3 definitely deserved all the appraise it got.

ANIMATED SHORT FILM – THE LOST THING (ANDREW RUHEMANN, SHAUN TAN)
It’s a shame I didn’t get to see even the short animated features this year, since I’ve so far always loved them quite a lot in Oscars. Of course I had seen Day & Night, loved it, but the price went to another film called The Lost Thing, of which I know nothing but it did look quite beautiful the seven seconds of it that I got to see. Congratulations, I’m sure you’ll get picked up, and have a great career at Pixar. I envy you… Well, thinking it another way, hope to see you around at Pixar one day!

LIVE ACTION SHORT FILM – GOD OF LOVE (LUKE MATHENY)
Another I-Have-No-Idea-What-You-Are-Talking-About -price, we hadn’t seen anything, and had no idea about the winners, so there’s nothing much to say.

SOUND EDITING & MIXING – INCEPTION (LORA HIRSCHBERG, GARY RIZZO, ED NOVICK & RICHARD KING)
I’ve always wondered why are Sound Editing & Mixing a different category, where as Visual Effects and Special Effects are not. Not to say that mixing and editing wouldn’t be a completely different crafts, but so are VFX and SFX. If someone can give me a feasible explanation, I’d loved to hear it. But Inception, yeah, well – what’s there to say? A technical Oscar, and Inception was by far the technically most satisfying movie of 2010, so it was the right address.

VISUAL EFFECTS – INCEPTION (CHRIS CORBOULD, ANDREW LOCKLEY, PETER BEBB, PAUL J. FRANKLIN)
I do have a bit of a problem of this category, knowing how much different worlds VFX and SFX can be. In my understanding and experience, Special Effects means everything that happens for real, and Visual Effects everything that’s created with a computer. So for example, rigging a huge rotating room and total zero gravity would be Special Effects, and creating a fire-breathing CGI dragon would be Visual Effects – and probably these two departments wouldn’t ever even get to meet or know each others’ names. But this year, there was Inception and Alice In Wonderland competing for the same price, and as it is well known, Alice was mostly CGI with so much green screen in the studio Tim Burton had to wear purple glasses to not to go crazy, where as Inception was basically made for real. Now don’t take me wrong, I do think Inception deserves the Oscar, but I’m just confused here – how can these two entities even begin to compete? It’s just two so completely different worlds…

ADAPTED SCREENPLAY / ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY – THE SOCIAL NETWORK / THE KING’S SPEECH (AARON SORKIN / DAVID SEIDLER)
The big fight in these oscars boiled down to The Social Network and The King’s Speech. Since both won their own categories of script, it was really hard to guess who’s gonna win, but as the Directing and Lead Actor went to The King’s Speech, it wouldn’t have made too much sense if The Social Network had won. But I’m sure every one of the scripts were amazing.

THE BEST PICTURE – THE KING’S SPEECH (THE WEINSTEINS)
Essi was saying The Social Network, and out of a brainfart mind of mine I said Inception (mainly because it’s always the movie that I least want to win that wins this price, but I should’ve been a bit more realistic…), but we both were wrong. It was, of course, The King’s Speech. And quite well-deserved one it was. I was secretly crossing my fingers for Toy Story 3 or maybe even Winter’s Bone which was a real indie film, but The King swoop the table and so it should’ve been. And remember, these 10 films were really well-deservedly aiming for the Best Picture, and (maybe apart from 127 Hours, which was fine but really, what was it doing in this category?) will remain legendary films of 2010′s in the years to come.

All together, the road was bad but the race was good. The gala was a bit crappy, but the films were particularly interesting this year. Next year, after we’re done with Trekathon, I’m going to be watching only films and my plan is to have seen every single one of the films of the next Oscars!

The Zombie Room Oscar Predictions are in!

Sunday, February 27th, 2011

This year has been quite a stupid year for us regarding the Oscars. As you may remember, last year I was in national TV, and I had seen mostly all of the films. This year – completely opposite. Neither of us has seen almost any of the films, mainly thanks to Trekathon. While the rest of the world has been going to movies, we’ve been sitting tight on our asses and watching Star Trek. So, this year’s predictions are mostly drawn together using the Hatson-Stetson -method – i.e. The Secret Art Of Guessing.

So, anyway. Here are the predictions. Tomorrow we’ll see which of us wins. And remember, these are not our *opinions* as much as they are our predictions on how the Academy will reward films.

TIMO’S OSCAR BALLOT:

Timo's Oscar Ballot

ESSI’S OSCAR BALLOT:

Essi's Oscar Ballot

Here’s what I learned directing Iron Sky – Notes from a newbie filmmaker

Sunday, February 13th, 2011

Photo by Tarja Jakunaho

Having just returned from Australia after finishing the shoot for my first professional feature film Iron Sky, I thought I’d take a second of your time and share some of the experiences I had within the last three and a half months and 40 shooting days to you who are interested in shooting a film somewhere in the future. I’m talking here to directors, but I’m sure people working in other positions might find something helpful here as well – if nothing else, reading this might make it easier for you to understand us, the directors, who are usually lost and hopelessly sad creatures on the set.

Working as a first-time director without a film school basis, walking into the set was a bit strange experience for me. I had never visited a real set, and I had only a vague idea on what the people on various positions do. So suddenly, I had people who I had no idea who they were asking questions I had no answer to. I’m really lucky to have as good First Assistant Director as I had (Peter McLennan) who was out there, really helping me out, and such a great Director of Photography as Mika Orasmaa is to make my life a bit easier. They both understood I knew nothing, but helped me through. The first three days were the worst, I made all the possible mistakes during those three days, but after that I started to learn more about the physics of the shoot, and that’s what I want to talk to all you first-time directors here.

PRE-PRODUCTION

Pre-production meeting at Frankfurt.

Pre-production is crucially important time for every filmmaker, and out of every second you have actually available for a proper pre with Director of Photography, First Assistant Director and other heads of departments, you should use them wisely to think through, inspect and tinker with every smallest detail. Because, as a director friend of mine told beforehand – if something can go wrong, it will. At least, you should be prepared to it. It’s clear you can’t prepare yourself for everything, so one of the best ways to try to leave a bit of air everywhere, to fix things as they fall apart.

BLOCKING AND SHOOTING

Blocking through a scene (Photo by Tarja Jakunaho)

Blocking through every scene beforehand is important. After the actors know what they are supposed to do, and the camera knows where to begin with, and where the key moments take place, it’s relatively easy to repeat the scenes over and over again. Ideally, you would have the possibility to rehearse the scenes beforehand with the actors, as clear as possible, but never lock yourself to what you come up within the rehearsals, because when coming over to the set, you find so much more possibilities and a huge load of problems that completely change whatever you’ve rehearsed. So rehearse, but keep an open mind when walking into the set.

Blocking the scene on the set – whether it’s based on rehearsals, or doing it cold turkey – is good to start before the actors arrive. Discuss it quickly through with DOP, or VFX supervisor, and with First Assistant Director, to make sure there’s nothing you didn’t take in account regarding lights, camera/crane angles or the lack of green screen, that could be fixed easily by just taking the action back few steps the other direction. That is because changing directions during the actual blockthrough gets confusing, and eliminating every bit of confusion beforehand is really important.

Photo by Tarja Jakunaho

After a quick walkthrough of the scene with heads of department, it’s time to clear the set, hold the work and get the cast in. Be prepared to give a bit of time for this – in many cases, this is the first time the actors walk into the set, and it takes a bit of time for them to familiarize the place. This usually takes the form of fooling around with some setpieces, doing something unexpected and just basically strolling around, asking questions and trying to understand more about everything. See, for you as a director you will already be very familiar with every small bit of the set, but for the actors, they’ve imagined the set in one way and whatever kind of set it is going to be, it definitely is different from what they’ve thought it to be. When the actors are familiar with the set, it’s so much easier for them to start inventing things, creating life to a dead set and bringing the characters alive in that surrounding. No matter in what kind of hurry you are, give the actors a bit of time to get familiar with everything, and you’ll get much better results on their end as well.

The actual blockthrough works – at least on my experience – quite well in three stages. First – it’s a readthrough. Just let the actors read through the lines, and let them wander around the set a bit more. The idea of the readthrough is to understand the approximate length of the scene, spot how the actors are going to perform and to find out possible problems in the first place. It’s quite possibly the first time you actually hear the dialogue, and depending on how precise you are with sticking to the script’s dialogue, you might want to make some notes about lines that don’t work very well. But – and this is important – DON’T start solving these issues at this stage. Now, you need to move.

Stunt action (Photo by Tarja Jakunaho)

Next, based on the readthrough, it’s time for a walkthrough. Tell the actors where to stand, who to talk to, how to approach the scene, where they can go and where not, and then let them do it once or twice, just to get an idea of the space they’ll be using. The walkthrough is usually also the biggest possibility for you to screw up things quite easily – so keep your script supervisor next to you. Make sure you don’t create any huge continuity issues at this stage, issues you won’t realize how big they are until they become actual problems when shooting. Just keep an eye on what big changes there are going to be – someone taking jacket off, someone lighting a cigarette, someone placing an item from a place to another – these issues are things you’re locked to, so make sure that’s what you want. Because once it’s been rehearsed that at this point she has a cigarette, it’s there, but if you at later stage realize that she can’t have the cigarette in another place, you’ll have to get rid of it somehow, which means possibly one or two more shots. Not to say it wouldn’t be worth it, and that’s what film is – constant action, motion, people doing things – just make sure that’s what you want, and try to realize the continuity issues it might bring up and then decide if it’s worth going for or not.

After the walkthrough, you’re going to properly block through the scene once or twice. This is as much for the actors as it is for the camera and the lightning department. You’ll watch as the actors perform the scene – almost like in a theater stage – and give the DOP (and you) the possibility to find the best angles and the best camera moves, and make some markers on the floor and/or walls for the actors, and then you’re good to go. As soon as you’re done with blocking the scene, leave the set as far away as you can. Let the departments begin their jobs, lighting the set, moving the crane, placing the green screen, and walk away with the actors…

Ready to shoot (Photo by Tarja Jakunaho)

Because – and this is usually one of the the most important moments of directing at least in my opinion – the post-block 20 minutes you have with the actors is the time to jump into problems of the text. If some action didn’t feel right, you have time to work on it. If some bit of dialogue just sucks, you have time to discuss it. If the actors have questions, you have a possibility to answer them. If someone has a completely different approach to the performance that you’re looking for, you have time to address this.

This 20 minutes is basically for you and the actors to get everything out of the scene before the cameras are rolling, because after that you’re on the set and you only have time for 3-4 re-takes per shot, which is usually just to fine tune the performances, and changing the big master action is not an option anymore, not without changing everything completely.

In short – don’t rush the blockthrough. Rushing it lands you in to even more problems, more time and more stress on the set. Solving the problems during and after the blocking makes it easy to repeat the same action from different camera angles, focusing on different actors and pieces of performance depending on the angle and the lens you’re using.

When starting to shoot, it’s good to know your actors. What you want is the best performances, but some actors are better during the first few takes, and some actors get better after they’ve familiarized themselves with the action and dialogue and other actors. So when planning the rhythm of the closeups and angles, always think where to start. Sometimes, it’s good to start with closer coverage, but usually I find it best to start with wide master shots, where you don’t see in too much detail the actors’ faces – this gives you time to rehearse the action as well, realize what’s wrong with performances, and start fixing them as you go into closer coverage. It’s a process, and once it’s clear and you know how it works, it’s quite straightforward. First do the wide masters, then pick a direction depending on your actors (the ones you know are better in the first few takes) and go tighter, tighter and tighter until you change the direction. Leave the pickups the last, because you either might find a way to grab that little bit of action as you shoot a direction, and if not, it’s usually good to use the main energy of the actors to the performances.

FILM MINUTE

Faster! Faster! Faster! (Photo by Tarja Jakunaho)

One of the biggest misconceptions on the set is something I call the Film Minute. It means the time it takes to fully accomplish one task. Usually, when you ask how long it takes from anyone, they’ll say “it’ll only be a couple of minutes”. It’s important to understand what does it mean, so here’s a little multiplier chart for you to understand what certain expressions of time mean:

Multiply film minute x 5:
* Camera Department
* Props Department (stand-by)
* Costume Department (stand-by)

Multiply film minute x 10
* Visual Effects department
* Stunt department

Now, as a director, what do you care? It’s the First Assistant Director’s job to keep up with the schedules – that’s true. But in the end of the day, it’s only you who knows what’s really relevant, what’s worth the time and the effort when looking at the big picture, what’s not. So, for example, if you want to have some sparkles on the scene, you might want it just because it looks nice, or because it establishes an important electricity malfunction which will be later used in the storytelling. 1st AD won’t know the importance of the one little thing, especially if it’s something you’ve come up at the set quite quickly, so it’s up to you to determine will it be the worth of the time it takes. Because, in the end of the day, it’s all about the coverage – you either have the coverage you need by the end of the day to edit the scene together, or you don’t. If you don’t, you go overtime. And the overtime is the thing that’s gonna kill you. Trust me.

So understanding Film Minutes is also director’s job, and even though your job as a director is not to micromanager things – there are departments for that – you need to have a good grasp of things.

The reason why Film Minute is never accurate is because of few reasons. First, every head of department makes things sound a bit easier than they are. It’s not because the lack of experience or because they’re just evil people, it’s because the other departments. There’s always unprepared requests coming from you – as the director – or from the DOP, or from the actors, and all this takes more time than prepared. The other point reason is usually that if something is changed, it usually needs rehearsals, new markers on the ground, new eyelines and so on. And especially, when you go into issues that have to do with electricity, safety, fire or stunts, there’s always the safety factor, the rehearsal and re-rehearsal factor and so on, which usually flows to other departments as well. So, basically Film Minute is usually quite accurate – if you work alone on the set. But whenever you’ll get a Film Minute estimate, remember that it’s just an estimate from one department – other departments usually will have their say on things as well.

And this, of course, is again not your job, but the First Assistant Director’s job to translate the length of the operation or request to you in realistic time, but before even giving a request, it’s good that you have an understanding on how long things will take, just to be on the same page. Remember – whatever you request out of the blue will usually cost money and time, so always be careful to request for things you are sure you want.

LANGUAGE ON THE SET

Photo by Tarja Jakunaho)

As a Finn, it’s hard to remember that you have to be more polite than is natural to you when working on the set with actors and the crew. In Finland, we don’t have a very good equivalent for the word “please” – which itself is short for “if it please you” – and we’re not used spreading compliments and excessive thanks around as much as we should. That’s just the basis of Finnish language – closest to really being polite, we do use T-V distinction, which in short means we talk of a person in plural, which sounds ridiculous in English, so we can’t even use that. But that’s no excuse – people on the set are used to better manners than Finns usually are especially when talking in foreign language, and that’s something we need to adjust to when working in a non-Finnish set.

This means, keep your ears tuned to how the people treat each other on the set. They do use words like “would you be so kind”, “please”, “sir” and “thank you” much more frequently than we Finns would. We had some feedback from the actors and the crew of our lack of pleases and thank-yous, and first we were a bit laughing about it but started to realize that the way we work does make us sound much ruder and much more assholes than we actually are, and I did learn to try to enhance my politeness whenever working with a non-Finnish crewmembers and/or actors. The words are “please”, “thank you” and “sir”. With these three additions to your normal English when working in a high-pressure environment – like a set usually is – you’ll come across more efficiently. Trust me.

SHOOTING IN GREEN

Studio before the green screen is up (Photo by Tarja Jakunaho)

Shooting in studio is a world of it’s own. It’s contained, controlled and a bit boring. Boring, because at least in our case we didn’t have any full sets on the stage – mainly floor, railings and some equipment that were important for the actors to interact with. Everything else would be created later on with CG, so every corner of the studio is surrounded with green screen. For me, as a director – and as quite an experienced director when it comes to a full-CGI-created sets like we had mainly in Star Wreck – it’s easier since I know every set and at least approximately know what kind of surroundings there will be created with a computer. But for everyone else working on the set, especially the actors and the Director of Photography, it’s really helpful if you spend a little bit more time with them to explain what’s supposed to take place in the green screens around you, what it looks like, and create some markers on the screen to give an idea where several objects or points of interests are. It’s still hard for the actors to really jump into the green screen set, especially if the actors are more used to traditional sets, so printing out whatever concept art – or even just some reference pictures – you might have of the set is going to be extremely helpful for them. Even better, if you have a 3D-environment on your laptop of the set with you, it’s very good, especially when planning the shots with DOP and other heads of department.

Green around the Moon (Photo by Mika Orasmaa)

But sometimes it might also be a good idea not to describe in too much detail what there is around them. Because the problem is for the actors that if they don’t really experience the space around, see the things moving around that are just dots on green screen, they have to imagine it, and they have to play it out loud, sometimes too loud for the camera. Udo Kier, when I was explaining him one of the sets, said he didn’t want to know too much. The set we were in was a huge hangar in the Moonbase, but Udo wanted to play it like it was his living room. He didn’t want to know of the marvels around him – in the end, he was playing the Moon Führer, and everything around him was blatant, boring and way too familiar to be marveled by his character, and this – not looking around, not paying attention to huge Moon Nazi stuff happening around, provided a performance that had more nobility to it.

So, when working on a green screen set with the actors, be careful how much information you feed up to them, and in what form. Sometimes, less is more. But take the time it needs to place good markers to whatever things you need, otherwise you’ll find actors looking around into completely wrong directions at same thing, and that’s just stupid.

Green Men (Photo by Tarja Jakunaho)

WATCHING THE MATERIAL

The Monitors (Photo by Tarja Jakunaho)

One of the things you need to be extremely careful with is showing the material to the actors during the shoot. Many people would like to see what they’ve just shot, but it’s not always a good idea to show material – actually, the less they see themselves on the screen, the less they have anything else but you as the director to trust upon, and the more they trust you, the better their performances will be for your film. That’s the general theory which I found good to follow. The best way that I found working for me is to create an environment where the actors trust 100% on you, and no other reference, and if they require to see the material, do show them that only to grasp the continuity or a bit of action, not the performances.

SCHEDULES

First page of the last callsheet

Last, but not least – let’s talk about schedules. Although it might feel a bit strange to jump on and take part in the scheduling from the first draft of the schedule on – do that. I didn’t, I had never seen a proper schedule before, and I didn’t pay too much attention to it. This attitude will backfire. Also, when working with the schedule, don’t fool yourself. Things take a certain amount of time on the set, and there’s usually nothing you can do about it. You can’t rush a stunt coordinator to do his or her’s job faster – if they are pro, they will do things efficiently, but their main concern – and your’s, too! – is the safety. And it takes a certain amount of time. So if you – sitting before your computer months before the shoot, looking at the schedule – go like “naah, we can do at least 30 shots on this day” – you’re fooling yourself. It’s good to remember that normally, you’re able to do 10-25 shots, depending on various factors. If you’re doing a well-contained drama scene with few actors, only dialogue, you might be able to cover 25 shots in a day. If you have a bit of action – someone slapping someone, someone falling etc, – it’s probably around 20. But if you have anything more than that, the number goes down. 15 if you have action with harnesses, or stunt doubles (not because the stunt doubles wouldn’t be effective, but because there’s makeup- and costume change etc ahead) and so on, and 10 if you have anything big like explosions, fire or other practical major visual effects.

It’s good to keep this in mind when preparing for the schedules, because it helps nobody if you’re not realistic with planning. Because, in the end, what you need is the required coverage, the required action and the required takes – if it’s unattainable, you’ll go overtime. And if you go overtime, your producers will hunt you down with machetes and chop you to pieces. Not to mention entities like Completion Bonds and so on. So, whatever you do – take your time really being realistic with schedule planning with your DOP and 1st AD – and even after that rehearse, use all the possible pre-production time you can ever have as effectively as possible and then you should be on the safe side. If you’re an experienced director, and walk on the set without having done pre or rehearsals, you’ll fluke it up. Either you’ll compromise the coverage – which usually means the scene doesn’t work – or action – which means the scene is boring – or takes – which means the actors act badly. And none of these things are what you want to do. You want to do a good film, and the best way to do one is by being realistic, no matter how boring it is.

AMA – ASK ME ANYTHING

So, here goes the first dump of random advice I mustered from my brains. I’ve done two AMA’s (Ask Me Anything) on Reddit, if you’re interested to hear more of my experiences, check them out. The first one is from the last night before the first shooting day in Frankfurt, and the second one just after the final wrap party of the whole shoot, in Gold Coast.

You can also ask questions in the comments section below.

Oh, and welcome back to Zombie Room. We’ve been silent for apparent reasons for quite some time, but now we’re back!

The Hobbit marches away from New Zealand

Wednesday, October 20th, 2010

It seems that the fight between some Actor’s Union thing in New Zealand and Peter Jackson‘s 2-part, 500-million-dollar The Hobbit has escalated to the point when Warner Bros has decided to take the production away from the lush, beautiful setting of New Zealand to wherever in Eastern Europe or something. To be honest, I haven’t been following too closely what the dispute is, but I’m surprised it got to this point, since I’m thinking for New Zealand the whole Tolkien franchise must’ve been a damn goldmine in so many ways, and I would assume they’d be fighting to keep it in their country. But more than that, I’m a bit worried, since one of the major great things about The Lord of the Rings was the beautiful environment Peter Jackson knew so well – and now, if the film is hauled to Romania or Bulgaria or wherever (hell, maybe even to Finland), we might lose some of that. But then again, for the film industry in Europe, a big production like that finding its way somewhere here wouldn’t be bad at all.

But I have a gut feeling that the last card hasn’t been played yet. It might be that Warner Brothers is just playing here, and eventually they’ll reach a settlement. There’s much more intelligent article about the whole situation on Slash Film, read it here.

In the meanwhile, the Zombies keep on waiting for the Hobbit almost as eagerly as The Lord of the Rings‘, but given the setbacks along its way, the expectations have been wounded a bit. Let’s hope the move from NZ is the last big problem, and rest of the filming goes well.

(In the labor dispute, I keep on wondering who’s the Hobbit, who’s Smaug and where the hell is Gandalf…)

James Cameron on fire.

Wednesday, October 20th, 2010

James Cameron seems to have a lot of things going. Well, at least that’s how it feels like when reading my usual film blogs today. The first bit of news concerns Avatar (2009) – two more films with blue fairies are coming up, and he’s about to shoot them back-to-back. Here’s his official statement:

“Our plan right now is to do ['Avatar 2 & 3'] as a single large production and release them a year apart. In order to do that, we have to refine our technical processes beyond the end of where we were finishing ['Avatar']a year ago. We need to future-proof ourselves out five or six years to the end of the third film.”

Good to hear, smells like it’s going to be quite an epic ride. Avatar is going to be re-released on Blu-Ray on November 16th, and there’s a bunch of never-before-seen deleted scenes, of which you can have a bit of a taste here.

And just to make sure mr. Cameron wouldn’t get bored, he’s also in talks to direct Cleopatra for Sony, with Angelina Jolie as the head fräulein – and he thinks she’d do good in playing that part.

“It sounds hot, doesn’t it? I mean, Angelina Jolie and Cleopatra? To me, that’s like a slam dunk,” he said. “Whether I wind up doing it or not, I think it’s going to be a great project.”

Who are we to disagree?

(Via GeekTyrant, The Hollywood Reporter, IO9, and New York Times)

Zombie Room Introduces: Irregular Film & Tech News!

Wednesday, October 20th, 2010

I realized we haven’t been too busy with Zombie Room lately, which is a shame. I think it’s a nice little film site, don’t you? I mean, it’s not a big-ass film blog, but still I like it.

So I thought let’s try to start pushing a bit of news on films and technology related to films (well, especially Internet) etc. to the site, related and unrelated to films. I’m not sure how regularly it’s possible to do this, but since I tend to follow quite a lot of what’s going on around there on the Internet, and I have a site to flood my thoughts on random issues, why not use it for what it is! And Essi will join, too!

I’m not to say these newsfloods are regular, hell no. But whenever something worth mentioning pops up, we’ll write about it. I didn’t come up with a better name but Newssplat. Is it stupid?

Well, hope this is a nice boost of fresh air to Zombie Room’s mausoleum! Film reviews, festival reports and that kind of stuff will follow, no matter what.

The Expendables are coming. You ready, mofos?

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

After so many disappointments lately, it’s a wonder there still are films left that give you a boner. The Expendables is definitely one of them – a brutal, straight-forward action flick, like they made them back in the 80’s.

Well, that’s what I hope, at least.

Zombie Room takes a look at The Expendables, possibly the manliest movie ever made.

Story is supposedly the core of any film, isn’t it? Well, that’s what I thought, and then I saw Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen. But tugging that pile of boiling dung aside, let’s see what The Expendables claims to be about:

This gives me a boner because: Well, the plot has everything. South America, corrupted dictators, mercenaries and a clear mission – with a twist! Love it – nowadays plots tend to go too far beyond what we want to see.

How can they botch it? It’s easy. If the twist sucks ass, or if they write too much story there. We don’t want the twist to be too fucking brilliant – one that overshadows what the reason why we are in the theater, which is bad-ass action. Also, the story shouldn’t be too fat – really, in case of The Expendables, we don’t’ give a shit about hardcore environment and/or political issues, deep story arches for the characters or any of that nonsense people usually like to see in the films. This is not that kind of a film.

The film is written by David Callaham and Sylvester Stallone, and directed by Sly himself. Looking at Callaham’s previous films, I’ve only seen Doom (2005), and Sly’s films we know already – Rocky (1976), Cobra (1986), Cliffhanger (1993) and Rambo (2008).

This gives me a boner because: Doom was stupid. It was ridiculous, idiotic, tasteless low-brow action comedy based on one of the best first-person shooters of all times. The film was shit, but fun to watch. Now Sly himself has always known how to take a very simple concept and make a flawless story around it. And as a director – well, this is right down his alley: masculine, bad-ass kick-you-in-the-fucking-face action with men, muscles and machine guns.

How can they botch it? As said, Doom was stupid, ridiculous, idiotic, tasteless, low-brow action comedy, and Sly is known to be best with films where he’s the main guy. Alone.

Of course, the biggest selling point from the very beginning is the cast. Stallone. Statham. Li. Lundgren. Rourke. Willis. This is how you sell a film.

And then, there’s a bunch of creeps I’ve never heard of before, like Eric Roberts (a hyperactive actor known lately from an extensive list of TV-roles), Randy Couture (Wrestler, known previously from shitty action films and games), Steve Austin (another Wrestler), David Zayas (that scary head honcho Latino from Oz), Giselle Itié (a Mexican-Brazilian super-hottie) and Terry Crews (the freaky president from Idiocracy).

And then, god among men, the giant of Graz, the Tyrannosaurus of Thal… Arnold Schwarzenegger.

This gives me a boner because: Stallone. Statham. Li. Lundgren. Rourke. Willis. Itié. Schwarzenegger.

How can they botch it? Really… they can’t. The cast is perfect.

And this is how the film looks like.

Jet Li complains his size:

Jason Statham plays basketball:

Rourke doing tattoo:

Statham blows some shit up.


The Expendables Exclusive Clip in HD

Trailer Park Movies | MySpace Video

TV-Clip

Trailer #1:

Trailer #2:

In conclusion, if The Expendables doesn’t give you a boner, go see a doctor. It’s coming out in about a week, and I’m eagerly waiting for the first reviews to confirm that this is what I hope it to be.

The Zombies are watching.

NOW ONLINE: Iron Sky – First Footage

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Trekathon Report 1 – The Original Series, Season 01

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Two weeks, 29 episodes. That’s the result of the first milestone of the Zombie Room‘s Trekathon. We decided to watch all of the Star Trek episodes in one year, and we’re well on our way!

So far, we’ve found out the following changes in our biological and mental state:

* The rate of Star Trek -jokes and/or terms and phrases has increased by 250%.
* The amount of films watched during the first period of the test has decreased radically.
* The interest towards other activities a couple can perform has decreased to almost zero.

But, on the bright side, we still can’t talk any Klingonese, and so far we haven’t started to wear Spock‘s ears while watching. We’ll see where this ends, though.

You can support our quest from a lively young couple into a drooling trekkie roommates by wearing Twibbon on your Twitter profile. We’re also reporting daily to our Trekathon blog about the progress, and if you’re following our ZombieRoom Twitter account, you’ve noticed that we’re tweeting there between and during the episodes.

So, hope you’re with us, at least in spirit!

Here’s some thoughts on each episode of the Star Trek: The Original Series – season 1.

00: THE CAGE
The first pilot that never got aired – luckily. It could’ve killed the whole franchise. Commander Pike was no match for Kirk’s smugness, and started off by whining about responsibilities of a captain. Really, Pike, if you can’t take the heat, stay the hell out of the kitchen… The Cage is an archetype of a mindfuckisode – an episode where the crew of Starship Enterprise gets their minds fucked by some strange jedi mind tricks. Nevertheless, we both still think that Vina (Susan Oliver) is the most beautiful woman in Star Trek.

01: THE MAN TRAP
More hot chicks, more mindfucking! Here’s how the Star Trek really begun, Kirk’s cocky smile shining over the bridge of a variety of interesting personalities, and a charmingly outdated monster and visual effects!


02: CHARLIE X
This one’s a clever one – an episode about a confused teenager taken into a science fiction setting. But nothing can take away the image of Kirk, without his shirt, in a set of burning-red spandex pants… What has been seen, can’t be un-seen!


03: WHERE NO MAN HAS GONE BEFORE
Kirk’s awesomeness in action – again, but this time for real. A guy thinks he’s a god, and Kirk takes time to try to speak him out of it. Unlike in many cases in the forthcoming episodes, he doesn’t succeed – and serious ass-kicking ensues. But the guy’s no god – he doesn’t even know his best friend’s second name, creating a grave for someone called James R. Kirk. Hello, mr. god-wannabe, it’s Tiberius, everyone knows that!


>04: THE NAKED TIME
As usual, if Sulu is on the episode, it turns out to be a mindfuckisode. This one’s a real treat, if you happen to like ‘em. The whole crew of the Enterprise, including Kirk, go crazy – everyone but Spock – because of an infection some loser-ass red shirt gets when visiting a planet. Sulu’s really losing it, running around the ship shirtless and harassing the crewmen and women with a sword. It’s fun, not very clever but fun.

05: THE ENEMY WITHIN
If you like Kirk, The Enemy Within should be your thing. Kirk’s personality gets split into two by some transporter malfunction. The “real” Kirk becomes an inefficient loser, and his dark side becomes a womanizing sex-machine. The episode is quite well written, and Shatner seems to enjoy having a double-role in the episode.

06: MUDD’S WOMEN
More hot chicks and a strange con-man, it’s a good combination! The episode has a moral learning to it – you are just as beautiful as you think you are.

07: WHAT ARE LITTLE GIRLS MADE OF?
More Kirks, this time an android duplicate of the main man. Can’t get my brains around where the name of the episodes comes from, but the picture on the left speaks for itself. What is it that you’re holding, commander?


08: MIRI
Here’s a strange episode, with quite an interesting concept: a planet where an infection turns people into zombies when they reach the age of 14. Taking place in the good old 20’s New York set where they seem to re-visit quite often, the crew is transported on the ground and gets hunted by a bunch of adults and harassed by a group of kids. It’s mainly constructed as a good old horror film, and the suspension is built quite nicely.

09: DAGGER OF THE MIND
If you happen to be travelling through the space, one thing you need to be constantly aware of are extremely well-mannered and charming random encounters, for they usually invite you over to their planet and try to kill you. At least, if you are Kirk. So nothing new for him in this episode.


10: THE CORBOMITE MANEUVER
Sorry… What? So you have the worst puppet ever, and the whole crew of the Enterprise falls to the trap. Ok. Fine. Really, this episode makes absolutely no sense, but it’s quite cute in its own, special way.








11-12: THE MENAGERIE
The only double-episode of the first season, and they spent it to recycle material from the unaired pilot. The original pilot was never that good, but they’ve managed to make it a hundred times crappier in The Menagerie. There’s a loose frame story focusing mainly around Spock doing thing Spock would never do, but most of the episode is just a re-edited version of The Cage. Very bad. But Vina is still hot…

13: THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KING
A ragisode (an episode where costumes play a big part of the general look & feel, usually medieval stage costumes), with loads of comically over-acted scenes, both off- and on stage. Every now and then the Star Trek takes a turn into hyper-serious direction, and usually it fails there. Like here.

14: BALANCE OF TERROR
Introducing Romulans, aliens that look quite like the Vulcans, but their warmongering makes them a barbaric race. Usually episodes like this make you think about the time when they aired these episodes – cold war was raging. And as in many cases when Kirk meets a commander, the theme of “had we met in different circumstances, we could’ve been friends” is present. Balance of Terror is a very good episode, a science fiction dogfight, touching given the romance aspect of the two crewmembers, and introduces an important element of the Star Trek universe.

15: SHORE LEAVE
Another ragisode, with princesses, talking rabbits, Alice from the Wonderland and loads of strange stuff that happens… But eventually what makes us watch the episode in awe is the super-annoying villain vs Kirk -fight – the double-fisting, Kirkemi (it’s his version of ukemi) and shirt suddenly ripping apart with no apparent reason.

16: GALILEO SEVEN
Another Spockisode (an episode where Spock is not just the database of Kirk, but actually doing something), which focuses around leadership. What is a good leader, the episode asks, and of course Kirk’s the best, although Spock acts logically and Kirk’s “opponent”, High Commissioner Ferris according to the text-book. The moral of the story is that it takes both brains and ability to follow orders and regulations to master the art of good leadership. The ridiculous monsters Spock & the crew encounter on the asteroid they’ve been marooned to kind of takes the oomph out of otherwise quite an intriguing story, but luckily they never go to close-up (they did, but edited it out… And the close-up of the monster was indeed quite terrible, but in an unintentional way – the horrible beast from the valley of Crappy Makeup and Inadequate Resources – you’ll find the rare pic from left).

17: THE SQUIRE OF GOTHOS
Ooh… Here we go again, a well-mannered maniac with omnipotent powers require Kirk & his crew to stay with him in his dominion. So rags, long speeches and super-intelligent creatures with the same problems as we have rule the episode. It’s fun to watch, but the whole episode becomes a minor annoyance by the end. In a way some pre-teenagers are annoying – meaning you kinda understand the pain, but you loathe the way they try to handle it.

18: ARENA
One of my all-time favorite Star Trek scenes is in Arena – it’s the fight scene between the Gorn and Kirk. Really, the suit couldn’t be any crappier, and the fight they have – Kirk with his double-fisting (yeah, I know… Sounds scary) and torn shirt fumbling around the “arena”. It’s an episode of endless, unintentional fun, but not a really good episode, to be honest.

19: TOMORROW IS YESTERDAY
Time travel, that’s what Star Trek has always done quite well, and Tomorrow is Yesterday is quite a good take on the subject. It’s focused around a 60s U.S. Air Force base, and shines in the reactions it portrays for the time traveller who’s taken to see Enterprise. The episode is delightful and turns on the brains, and refuses to take itself too seriously.

20: COURT MARTIAL
Usually, the most interesting stories are born from the simplest of settings. In Court Martial, Kirk is facing a trial on a dispute over a dead crewmember, and the story is played out quite well. It builds a good suspense and court thriller and introduces a nice and intriguing set of characters with different ambitions. There science fiction –setting is not exaggerated too much, although the heartbeat-sound –thing in the end is maybe a bit too much. And the fight scene in the end with world’s most obvious stunt players in CLOSE-UPS reminds us of how the quality of the TV sets have gone up during the last 40-something years.



21: THE RETURN OF THE ARCHONS
Above everything, Kirk is a wonderful orator. He can make a computer that has been controlling the people for centuries realize it’s actually evil and should destroy itself, in two short monologues. What a guy.





22: SPACE SEED
So far, Space Seed has been the best episode of Star Trek. I was tightly written, the main premise of the episode was very interesting, and they had casted the perfect villain – Khan, played by wonderful mr. Ricardo Montalban – who totally outshone everyone else. Not a big surprise this episode inspired one of the best Star Trek movies ever made, though 15 years later.

23: A TASTE OF ARMAGEDDON
So here we go again: Kirk opens his mouth for couple of short monologues and manages to end a 500-year-old massacre of millions of people. What a guy. I liked the episode’s Paranoia-type of feeling with suicide booths & computer overpower.





24: THIS SIDE OF PARADISE
A mindfuckisode like never before (yeah, Sulu’s there too)! Spock HANGING FROM THE TREE, KISSING A WOMAN, SMILING AND LAUGHING! It felt… strange. We had to go and wash our hands after the episode was over… It was so strangely dirty. This time it was some kind of spores that did the trick for the Enterprise crew and the civilization on the ground.

25: THE DEVIL IN THE DARK
A huge living emo pizza creature terrorizes a mining colony, and the Enterprise crew goes down to solve the problem. Spock uses his mind melt and becomes a struggling poet interpreting the pizza’s mind.

26: ERRAND OF MERCY
I like this one quite a lot – it has a strong anti-war message and we meet the Klingons for the first time. Kirk is just as stupid war-mongering barbarian as the Klingon warlord, and the USA vs. Russia –setting is portrayed in quite a realistic light.





27: THE ALTERNATIVE FACTOR
Excuse me… WTF? Who gave Andy Warhol the camera, and why did he have to take so much LSD?








28: THE CITY ON THE EDGE OF FOREVER
Harlan Ellison wrote one of the greatest and most thought-provoking episodes of Star Trek, which spiked the director and the cast to do an excellent work. It’s an ambitious episode that manages to live to it’s script surprisingly well. A very beautiful and touching story of epic proportions.








29: OPERATION — ANNIHILATE!
A nice ending to a great first season of Star Trek, nothing very special, but I did feel Spock’s pain. Really gave Leonard Nimoy a change to shine for awhile.

Zombie Sunday: Evil Dead coming back?

Sunday, March 14th, 2010

Happy Sunday to everyone!

Sam Raimi’s The Evil Dead is coming back to theaters! Fangoria reports:

“The theatrical reissue of Sam Raimi’s classic THE EVIL DEAD is in full swing, having launched last Friday in Los Angeles to a sold-out crowd.”

Read more here.

Any idea if somebody is already doing a remake of The Evil Dead?

Oh, and here’s a strip I found from Lio:

Alright, have a good one! And don’t forget to check out how Trekathon is progressing!

Related Posts with Thumbnails