Archive for the ‘Piracy’ Category

Death of a CD/DVD/BluRay?

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

TechCrunch just wrote an article claiming today being officially the death of compact discs (basically in any format, be it CD, DVD or BluRay). Their reasoning was because the writer MG Siegler had realized he hadn’t used the DVD drive of his MacBook ever for anything. With computers, I’m quite confident that’s the future, and I couldn’t be more happier with it. But what about film industry? When do we get rid of the DVDs and BluRays, and do we even want to?

I’m all for digital distribution, all for the easiest flow of entertainment. But looking around my house right now, I’m unfortunately not seeing an easy way out when it comes to films. And again, unlike with those horrible computer program boxes filled with nothing but air, I do have a mental attachment to our DVD collection. It’s not huge, but it’s cute. In a bachelor nerd way. And compared to a collection of computer program boxes, that become historical relics after just one year when a new version of the program has replaced the earlier one, these are eternal. And by eternal I mean they last 15-20 years. But that’s ten-twenty times longer than a computer program. And even a computer game – watching a wall full of computer games, it’s not quite likely you find yourself in a sudden rush of nostalgia, pull out your old Amiga, set it up, install Monkey Island 2 and spend few hours playing it. It sounds great, but really for that to happen… I don’t think so.

There's a bunch of 'em. Not a huge collection, and a bit messy, but good stuff there is!

So DVDs and BluRays have more collecting value. But in addition to that, still looking around my house and the equipment I have, there’s absolutely no way a digital download of a film would be superior to a physical high quality BluRay, 1080p, 5.1 sound, the works. Connecting my computer through a display port to a HDMI adapter to my TV, then pulling out an optical cable and rigging it to my laptop, then downloading the 1080p file from a pirate site, watching it… It’s just too much hassle, a hassle which I can get around by just walking to Sokos next door, grabbing the desired BluRay, sticking it to my PS3 and kaboom, it’s on. It’s easily something I’m happy to pay 20-30 bucks, and then – I have the physical copy in my collection, available for watching quickly anytime I want. And more than that, just a glance on the wall of my room, and registering titles like Terminator 2, Citizen Kane, American Beauty, Big Fish – even unconsciously – makes me feel like I’m in a good place. Somehow, watching the same names typed on a computer screen with 10pt Tahoma don’t work the same way.

So, the reason BluRays (and DVDs) will live on for at least another 10 years are three:

1) As a physical item, they have a collecting and portability value.
2) As long as hooking your laptop to your home entertainment system requires even hooking one cord somewhere, it’s not working.
3) As long as there’s no reasonable online version that will provide the easiness, the enjoyment of collectibility and the quality of a BluRay.

The conclusion is: digital distribution is not killing the film business. It adds a new customer segment, that will merge *in the future* to the existing one, making it stronger. But as long as the digital pioneers are being punished for the mistakes the industry makes, there’s not enough synergy that this would happen. Hunting “pirates” should end, and we should come up together with the industry, the audience, the film buffs, the Internet and the filmmakers a distribution system that’s making sense so that the merging from physical units to digital distribution would be painless, productive, profitable and possible.

Ugh. Ramble off.

Pride And Prejudice And The Walking Dead

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

A bit of Zombie news, for a change. I happened to buy the copy of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith quite randomly from Brisbane, and haven’t read a page of it. More than a book I want to read, it’s a book I want to own. But nevertheless, a film of it is coming up, yet it’s still quite ambiguous what kind of a film – directed by who and starred by who – it’s going to be. But more than a film I want to see, it’s a film that I’m happy to see get made. It might be directed by David Slade, or Mike Newell, or Neil Marshall, or … well, it basically could be anybody who’s done some sort of a genre hit lately. Yet I’d be happiest to see it being directed by Finland’s own AJ Annila. That would bring an interesting angle to the film indeed.

In other news, there’s been obviously a lot of talk about The Walking Dead TV-series lately, and as far as I can gather, it’s premiering on Halloween somewhere in the states, and exactly 30 seconds after it’s out, also on Pirate Bay. Latest bit of goodies are the new behind the scenes shots from the makeup studio of The Walking Dead, available here. Oh, and here’s the trailer for the series, check it out.

(Via GeekTyrant)

X-Men Origins: Wolverine Leaked Online – Good or Bad?

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

wolverine

I have been following the Wolverine scandal very closely ever since it happened. First it was suggested that maybe it was just an April Fools’ joke, but it wasn´t. 20th Century Fox released a statement confirming the leak right after it happened. Everyone at Fox and all the people involved have gone totally ballistic over this and are doing all they can to prevent people from downloading the movie (of course we know there is not that much they can do). The FBI and MPAA are investigating the case. I even got an estimate from someone that because of the leak they will loose approximately 20% of their potential clients due to it. Well I don´t know about that. We here at Zombie Room think a bit differently and I would like to talk about a few things why the leak probably won´t hurt the film as much as the people at Fox are afraid of.

wolverine_origin_xmen_movie

GOOD VS. BAD

First of all I would like to say that I DON´T approve of the leak. I have no intentions of watching the movie anywhere else than in the biggest movie theatre I can find. Now that this is clear, I can also say that don´t approve the contemporary way of distributing films either.  Like I said I haven´t seen the film, but I have heard that the version is in pretty good quality. Never the less, the film is unfinished. According to the press release the film was without many effects and had missing scenes and temporary sound and music. Read the full press release here (I also recommend to read the comments, they are priceless).

It is pretty obvious that most of the people who have downloaded the movie would have done so anyway. The only difference is that now they get to see the movie earlier than usual. As soon as Wolverine hits the cinemas it will be in the internet for download anyway, only then it will be in bad theater cam quality. For me quality and accessibility are everything. I will never watch anything in bad quality and I don´t think anything beats the movie theatre. But I´m sick and tired of having to wait around for the movies that have already been released. Especially when they are just a click away for free.

x-men-origins-wolverine

Hugh is very very angry!!!

In a way I´m happy that this happened because it will be very interesting to see what this leak actually does to the movies success. My guess is that it will be one of the most successful films of the year, if not the most successful. And in fact because of the leak it will get an even bigger audience. And I´m talking Dark Knight success. In fact, X-Men Origins: Wolverine has now been downloaded over a million times. This alone should say something about the interest the public has for this movie. It is actually a compliment to the  movie and if it is any good people will go see it, even after seeing the unfinished version.

I do agree 100% that all movie studios and distributors loose money because of piracy, that´s a fact. But piracy could be wiped out almost completely if the distribution model was to change. People actually want to pay for those downloads, so what´s the problem? 

There is a poll at TorrentFreak where you can give your opinion on the matter. I think the options say it all. There are now 6165 votes counted and the results are pretty clear. You can give your vote here.

x-men-pollMY ANSWER: No, the leak actually got me excited to see it in theater/on DVD.

The zombies are keeping a close eye on this one and hopefully it will finally give the studio executives something to think about.

- Essi

I’m A Pirate (So Sue Me)

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

pirates-knocked-up-shrekI’m working for the film industry here in Finland. My salary comes from a company called Energia Productions, a company which gets money through government subsidies (like Finnish Film Foundation) and from the distribution of it’s films, either through distribution companies (they pay a certain % of each unit sold) or through our own resale. Anyway, I get my tummy full every day because people pay me to see or buy my films.

And still, I think the only good guy in the distribution industry is the ”pirate”. I’m talking about the forest fire that sweeps through the vast, old woodland, leaving only ashes behind. Ashes, from where even more healthier industry can be born from. A 15-year old nerd living in his/her’s mom’s apartment and renewing the 100-year old business in between wanking, IRCing and Facebookng. The only asshole not after my money in the industry.

I’m a pirate myself. I started out with music – downloading hudreds of gigs of music from all over the world, getting to know thousands of new bands along my active piracy years. But then, one day, I decided to trash all the illegal music from my harddrive and start buying the music I was in to. The reason wasn’t definitively the sudden strike of conscience, but the fact that I felt uninterested on the music because of the sheer mass of it now flowing slowly to my harddrive. I felt I needed to focus a bit, so I focused on music that I had paid for, and trashed everything else.

All went well, until I found myself in a situation that I didn’t have either enough money or time to worry about my music – I felt that if I wanted to listen to something, I should be able to do it without hesitation. And then, along came Spotify. A service where I just have to pay a yearly 100€ to keep me listening to all the music I could ever want to, and much, much more. So now I’m satisfied, a perfect balance has been found: I have all the music I want to, and somebody else is worrying about getting the stuff to me. I just open the tap, get what I want and as much as I want, and my money goes to the artist. Well, there’s of course the middlemen… But that’s, in the end, the industry’s problem, not mine.

How about movies? I’ve started downloading films via BitTorrent, through such places like Pirate Bay or Mininova actually quite recently. The reason was actually Essi: she re-ignited my interest towards film, flooding me with all the news on interesting productions popping out everywhere around the world and hyping about classics that I should’ve watched a long time ago. Nowadays, I rate my films in three categories:

theater

These are the must-see-as-soon-as-possible-with-the-best-quality-available -films, with either a subject so important to me, or with special effects so special they rock the theater big time. Or films that are very strongly time-related, like the Oscar-nominated ones.

Usually these films are something everyone is hyping about all over the Internet, and waiting for them to land here in Finland is quite frustrating. So, in most cases, I don’t want to wait for them, and just end up downloading a screener, and never go to the theater, just because somebody wants to regulate the territorial rights.

So, because everyone is avoiding the day-and-date releases unless it’s the big-ass film of the year, as well as almost banning the multi-platform releases, film studios lose 80% of my money for not offering what I want, when I want in the format I’d prefer.

dvd

The second category of films are the ones that I don’t need or won’t have the time to go and see in theaters. There are two reasons I’d like to buy them on DVD – the quality and the box. In most cases, I want to watch the film in the best possible quality at home, and very often the BitTorrent version is of a little bit lower quality (and my TV set is so crappy that I can plug into it only through SCART, so at least there the quality is killed). In some cases, I also want to have the copy to my collections, so that I can watch it again at second’s notice. I’m not a big fan of the boxes itself, and more than that, I hate most of the extra material on a DVD, since they are, in most cases, just total, utter, viewer’s-intelligence-despising crap, but having the DVD in my collections – well, there’s some value to it.

But my dilemma is: why to pay 20e of the film, if I just want to watch it once and then forget it? It’s more than in theater, and I’m not fond of the less-than-respectable quality extras anyway. And as I’ve learned personally, the only films that deliver any kind of income to the filmmakers themselves are the full-priced ones, so buying a DVD with 5,99e just get my money to the store-owner, the one person having nothing to do with the film itself.

I don’t even want to go to the flaws of renting a film, but let me just say this: the most preferred way for me would be watch films online. I wouldn’t have to worry about anything – the availability, the heaps of boxes of films I’ll never watch again, the fact I’m paying money for the crappy extras I don’t even want to watch…

I did a little test the other day with Essi. We had a Male Superiority Sunday, when we watched films by Steven Seagal, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Clint Eastwood – and suddenly, we ran out of films to watch. We wanted to see Commando, but didn’t have the copy. Renting was completely out of question – having to walk 3 miles to the nearest rental store wasn’t the thing I wanted to do. So we finally decided to try online rentals.

We are not complete idiots with computers, I’m a bit short-tempered with them, but I get along with different net services quite well, even if they are a bit lame. But we just couldn’t rent a film from any of the five services availble here in Finland we tried. It just was completely impossible.

So, again, money lost. We got frustrated, downloaded what we wanted and watched the film.

torrent

The films that I get via BitTorrent are, in addition to the expections from above, the films that will never travel to Finland, or are classics too hard to find from stores or rental stores… Just some strange, great films from all over the world that I want to see, but would never be able to get from anywhere. I could try Amazon or Play.com, but I’ve decided to boycott those – I just hate browsing for stuff, finding exactly what I want, and then finding out that ”this product can’t be delivered to your country”. Makes me feel like Finland is in some sort of a third-world commercial blockage…

So again, a lot of money lost, and now the so-called ”long tail” gets the hit. The smaller, international filmmakers, the ones that I’d loved to support if possible. And it’s not.

Given these facts, am I a criminal? I would’ve wanted to pay for the films I watch, but it just was completely impossible for me at the level of effort I was willing to put into it.

So it’s like I’m driving a car on a long and lonesome highway, about run out of fuel. I stop by at a gas station, fill the tank, and when going inside to pay, there’s completely nobody, doors are locked and the station is dead because the gas station owner just didn’t feel like coming to work today. I’m not going to just sit around and wait for the owner to show up. If my money is not good for the owner, then I’m off, fuck him.

I don’t believe that digital sharing and distribution of films is piracy, and criminal action as such. It’s just a byproduct of the corporate-controlled industry that’s too slow to adapt, and consumers – the people who LOVE the stuff the corporates are producing – shouldn’t be the ones that take the hit.

EDIT: I just received a funny email, which says:

helpcinema.eu invites you to participate in an online petition against illegal file sharing.

Helpcinema is an initiative taken by European film professionals to collect your reactions regarding the effects of illegal file sharing on the audio-visual industry. This input will be used to give European Members of Parliament a new perspective on the subject.

You can easily participate by answering our three-step questionnaire available here. Your e-mail address will be kept confidential.

If you love cinema and if you have an opinion to share, please show your support and send us your feedback.

So go over to helpcinema.eu and share your thoughts. Not surprisingly, I answered ‘no’ three times.

-Timo

Feature film ‘Blank’ released for free distribution!

Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

I think it was Star Wreck that just happened to be the first feature film ever released for free on the Internet. After that, we’ve seen such masterpieces as We Are The Strange and Four-Eyed Monsters being released on the Internet, and now it’s time for a new film to emerge for free, torrent-based distribution: Blank.

I’m quoting TorrentFreak‘s blogger enigmax, under CC-By-Sa -license:

Times are certainly changing and slowly but surely people are beginning to realize that rather than trying to fight piracy and destroy file-sharing networks, the best approach is to embrace your one-time rivals and try and create something positive.

Established in 2000 by director Rick L. Winters, Annodam Productions is an independent film company. A forward looking outfit, Annodam will premiere its latest movie Blank, worldwide today.

Blank is the story of a Johnny, a young boy who witnesses the violent death of his parents and older sister. Roll on some 20 years later and Johnny becomes involved in crime with his adoptive father – who is also a crime boss. While watching a game of poker Johnny discovers who murdered his family and sets about planning his revenge. Johnny unwittingly becomes involved with a pair of serial killers and the whole movie climaxes with a bizarre and shocking end.

While the plot may seems standard Hollywood fare, the way this movie has been financed and is set to be distributed is not – Director Rick L.Winters explains, “The thing that makes this film unique is that it is a co-op based concept where the entire cast and crew worked on a deferred percentage of the film’s gross. In other words, the cast and crew own a percentage of the film’s gross, so the profits are not going to Hollywood executives but instead into the pockets of the filmmakers themselves.”

After receiving several distribution offers for Blank, Rick turned them all down.

“I have seen firsthand the greed that lurks in the Hollywood corporate circles,” he said while explaining that after he released his first film, the cast and crew couldn’t understand why a distribution company was making all the money. So instead, Rick decided to let the audience distribute Blank for him – via BitTorrent.

“This time around the fate of the cast and crew getting paid is in the hands of the audience who watch the film. No Hollywood bank accounts being filled to turn out more crappy remakes,” he said, while adding that the future of film is “in the home market, through peer to peer distribution.”

Today, Blank is released on DVD for $14.99, via online streaming and of course, for free on BitTorrent. “No one should have to pay for a film they did not like,” says Rick. “No one should be denied the right to enjoy the art of film.”

The idea is that if people like the movie after they have seen it, they should go to the Blank website and make a donation. People are asked to donate what they feel the movie is worth, and in return will be invited to follow the production of the next movie, which they will have helped finance through their donation.

Rick told TorrentFreak, “I am excited with the aspects of peer to peer distribution and the possibilities. Giving everyone the opportunity to see my film for free in hope of receiving donations is a little nerve wrecking – wondering if I will receive enough donations to make my next film. The concept is still scary for independent filmmakers who don’t have the big budgets like the big studios and most of the time drain their personal accounts and run up credit just to get their film made, in hopes of recouping the cost of making the film.”

Several large BitTorrent sites including Mininova will be offering Blank, but undoubtedly it will spread to many others too. Rick L. Winters is also writing a book which will document the whole process so that others can use the same methods to distribute their own movies.

“I can only hope for the success of this endeavor to show the world that the revolution of peer to peer distribution can no longer be ignored and the time is now,” Rick told TorrentFreak. “I decided to try the concept of a coop base film in hopes of encouraging other independent filmmakers to come together and create and share the art of film for EVERYONE to enjoy.”

Congratulations to Rick and the crew for effectively ending the piracy of their movies and we wish them the best of luck with ‘Blank’ and all future success.

You can grab the torrent for the movie from Mininova.

This is also a nice lead into our next blogging spree, about to be released possibly during the next week on piracy and free distribution. I’m sad to say that the website of the Blank is quite unattractive and doesn’t really push you to put in the donation, but however the film will turn out (I’m downloading it now, a review is to follow inevitably), I will do my part in donations as well as hoping to get my hands on the DVD as well!

Also, the co-op -model in the production is definitively something independent filmmakers should look into.

All together, I’m happy and proud that these freaks are part of the movement leading us to the brighter future (can’t talk about free distribution without sounding an idealistic communist)! I sure hope the film is at least decent, and we’ll keep an eye on this one. Indeed, The Zombies Are Watching.

-Timo

Quotes on piracy

Saturday, February 14th, 2009

piracy
(Photo by Graphixar.)

Almost every day we can read or hear some of the old-guard media assholes slowly turning their heads and understanding that piracy in it’s current, most common form – the digital download – is not a crime. But there’s still a long road to travel. Luckily, there are people in the influential positions not scared shitless to say how they really think things are.

Just few weeks ago Jason Holtman from Valve, one of the biggest game production companies in the world, was talking at Game Business Law Summit, explaining the ways to really solve one of the huge reasons why people do digital downloads instead of paying for the stuff. Now this is games, but the same thing goes with film.

“We take all of our games day-and-date to Russia,” Holtman says of Valve. “The reason people pirated things in Russia,” he explains, “is because Russians are reading magazines and watching television — they say ‘Man, I want to play that game so bad,’ but the publishers respond ‘you can play that game in six months…maybe.’ ”

“We found that our piracy rates dropped off significantly,” Holtman says, explaining that Valve makes sure their games are on the shelves in Moscow and St. Petersberg, in Russian, when they release it to North America and Western Europe.

The final sacred cow that Holtman took a stab at was the issue of piracy. “There’s a big business feeling that there’s piracy,” he says. But the truth is: “Pirates are underserved customers.”

I think the last line is really one of the best ways to put the problem, and the companies – in game, film and music – who understand this will evolve their products and distribution to meet the needs of the people out there and will survive the next 5-10 years.

A British distribution company Revolver tried this also few months ago, and released their horror film Mum & Dad simultaneously in cinemas, on DVD, as a download, and as VOD. One would think that since this has never been done before that the industry would be following with a great interest on how the new radical approach – which really tries to deliver a film day-and-date to all media distribution platforms – would work. But instead, the cinema association wrote an open letter and asked the cinemas across UK to boycott the film, since it’s taking them out of business.

So yes, there’s still a long road ahead, a lot of concrete-headed wankers scared as hell and ready to put their full arsenal and throw it against the new technology.

But the ex-boss of EMI Norway, Per Eirik Johansen, puts it very clearly:

“No one has ever won a battle when fighting against new technology,”

Mr. Johansen used to be a valiant fighter against pirates while still working on EMI, but now that he’s working on his own label, he has come out of the closet and is talking his mind freely.

He now believes the music industry’s fight against piracy has been useless and says he disagrees with the assertion that illicit file-sharing is the same as theft. Referring to an earlier EMI anti-piracy initiative, Johansen noted, “The message of that campaign is that there is a reason why we have copyright, and I agree.”

“But the main thing is that a whole generation already violates copyright, and the only thing we can do now is find better solutions,” he says pragmatically.

Quotes from GameDaily’s article and TorrentFreak’s article.

Related Posts with Thumbnails