Archive for April, 2009

X-Men Origins: Wolverine Leaked Online – Good or Bad?

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

wolverine

I have been following the Wolverine scandal very closely ever since it happened. First it was suggested that maybe it was just an April Fools’ joke, but it wasn´t. 20th Century Fox released a statement confirming the leak right after it happened. Everyone at Fox and all the people involved have gone totally ballistic over this and are doing all they can to prevent people from downloading the movie (of course we know there is not that much they can do). The FBI and MPAA are investigating the case. I even got an estimate from someone that because of the leak they will loose approximately 20% of their potential clients due to it. Well I don´t know about that. We here at Zombie Room think a bit differently and I would like to talk about a few things why the leak probably won´t hurt the film as much as the people at Fox are afraid of.

wolverine_origin_xmen_movie

GOOD VS. BAD

First of all I would like to say that I DON´T approve of the leak. I have no intentions of watching the movie anywhere else than in the biggest movie theatre I can find. Now that this is clear, I can also say that don´t approve the contemporary way of distributing films either.  Like I said I haven´t seen the film, but I have heard that the version is in pretty good quality. Never the less, the film is unfinished. According to the press release the film was without many effects and had missing scenes and temporary sound and music. Read the full press release here (I also recommend to read the comments, they are priceless).

It is pretty obvious that most of the people who have downloaded the movie would have done so anyway. The only difference is that now they get to see the movie earlier than usual. As soon as Wolverine hits the cinemas it will be in the internet for download anyway, only then it will be in bad theater cam quality. For me quality and accessibility are everything. I will never watch anything in bad quality and I don´t think anything beats the movie theatre. But I´m sick and tired of having to wait around for the movies that have already been released. Especially when they are just a click away for free.

x-men-origins-wolverine

Hugh is very very angry!!!

In a way I´m happy that this happened because it will be very interesting to see what this leak actually does to the movies success. My guess is that it will be one of the most successful films of the year, if not the most successful. And in fact because of the leak it will get an even bigger audience. And I´m talking Dark Knight success. In fact, X-Men Origins: Wolverine has now been downloaded over a million times. This alone should say something about the interest the public has for this movie. It is actually a compliment to the  movie and if it is any good people will go see it, even after seeing the unfinished version.

I do agree 100% that all movie studios and distributors loose money because of piracy, that´s a fact. But piracy could be wiped out almost completely if the distribution model was to change. People actually want to pay for those downloads, so what´s the problem? 

There is a poll at TorrentFreak where you can give your opinion on the matter. I think the options say it all. There are now 6165 votes counted and the results are pretty clear. You can give your vote here.

x-men-pollMY ANSWER: No, the leak actually got me excited to see it in theater/on DVD.

The zombies are keeping a close eye on this one and hopefully it will finally give the studio executives something to think about.

- Essi

Mutants trailer out.

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

Trailer for French Zombie-film MUTANTS just landed on Twitch Film, and it looks absolutely wonderful. Seems like a pure modern Zombie film – cold, fast-pacing, merciless and right to the point.

Pixar vs. Dreamworks

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

This, I think, very well describes the main differences between the two animation giants :) (Click the picture to actually read it).

I’m A Pirate (So Sue Me)

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

pirates-knocked-up-shrekI’m working for the film industry here in Finland. My salary comes from a company called Energia Productions, a company which gets money through government subsidies (like Finnish Film Foundation) and from the distribution of it’s films, either through distribution companies (they pay a certain % of each unit sold) or through our own resale. Anyway, I get my tummy full every day because people pay me to see or buy my films.

And still, I think the only good guy in the distribution industry is the ”pirate”. I’m talking about the forest fire that sweeps through the vast, old woodland, leaving only ashes behind. Ashes, from where even more healthier industry can be born from. A 15-year old nerd living in his/her’s mom’s apartment and renewing the 100-year old business in between wanking, IRCing and Facebookng. The only asshole not after my money in the industry.

I’m a pirate myself. I started out with music – downloading hudreds of gigs of music from all over the world, getting to know thousands of new bands along my active piracy years. But then, one day, I decided to trash all the illegal music from my harddrive and start buying the music I was in to. The reason wasn’t definitively the sudden strike of conscience, but the fact that I felt uninterested on the music because of the sheer mass of it now flowing slowly to my harddrive. I felt I needed to focus a bit, so I focused on music that I had paid for, and trashed everything else.

All went well, until I found myself in a situation that I didn’t have either enough money or time to worry about my music – I felt that if I wanted to listen to something, I should be able to do it without hesitation. And then, along came Spotify. A service where I just have to pay a yearly 100€ to keep me listening to all the music I could ever want to, and much, much more. So now I’m satisfied, a perfect balance has been found: I have all the music I want to, and somebody else is worrying about getting the stuff to me. I just open the tap, get what I want and as much as I want, and my money goes to the artist. Well, there’s of course the middlemen… But that’s, in the end, the industry’s problem, not mine.

How about movies? I’ve started downloading films via BitTorrent, through such places like Pirate Bay or Mininova actually quite recently. The reason was actually Essi: she re-ignited my interest towards film, flooding me with all the news on interesting productions popping out everywhere around the world and hyping about classics that I should’ve watched a long time ago. Nowadays, I rate my films in three categories:

theater

These are the must-see-as-soon-as-possible-with-the-best-quality-available -films, with either a subject so important to me, or with special effects so special they rock the theater big time. Or films that are very strongly time-related, like the Oscar-nominated ones.

Usually these films are something everyone is hyping about all over the Internet, and waiting for them to land here in Finland is quite frustrating. So, in most cases, I don’t want to wait for them, and just end up downloading a screener, and never go to the theater, just because somebody wants to regulate the territorial rights.

So, because everyone is avoiding the day-and-date releases unless it’s the big-ass film of the year, as well as almost banning the multi-platform releases, film studios lose 80% of my money for not offering what I want, when I want in the format I’d prefer.

dvd

The second category of films are the ones that I don’t need or won’t have the time to go and see in theaters. There are two reasons I’d like to buy them on DVD – the quality and the box. In most cases, I want to watch the film in the best possible quality at home, and very often the BitTorrent version is of a little bit lower quality (and my TV set is so crappy that I can plug into it only through SCART, so at least there the quality is killed). In some cases, I also want to have the copy to my collections, so that I can watch it again at second’s notice. I’m not a big fan of the boxes itself, and more than that, I hate most of the extra material on a DVD, since they are, in most cases, just total, utter, viewer’s-intelligence-despising crap, but having the DVD in my collections – well, there’s some value to it.

But my dilemma is: why to pay 20e of the film, if I just want to watch it once and then forget it? It’s more than in theater, and I’m not fond of the less-than-respectable quality extras anyway. And as I’ve learned personally, the only films that deliver any kind of income to the filmmakers themselves are the full-priced ones, so buying a DVD with 5,99e just get my money to the store-owner, the one person having nothing to do with the film itself.

I don’t even want to go to the flaws of renting a film, but let me just say this: the most preferred way for me would be watch films online. I wouldn’t have to worry about anything – the availability, the heaps of boxes of films I’ll never watch again, the fact I’m paying money for the crappy extras I don’t even want to watch…

I did a little test the other day with Essi. We had a Male Superiority Sunday, when we watched films by Steven Seagal, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Clint Eastwood – and suddenly, we ran out of films to watch. We wanted to see Commando, but didn’t have the copy. Renting was completely out of question – having to walk 3 miles to the nearest rental store wasn’t the thing I wanted to do. So we finally decided to try online rentals.

We are not complete idiots with computers, I’m a bit short-tempered with them, but I get along with different net services quite well, even if they are a bit lame. But we just couldn’t rent a film from any of the five services availble here in Finland we tried. It just was completely impossible.

So, again, money lost. We got frustrated, downloaded what we wanted and watched the film.

torrent

The films that I get via BitTorrent are, in addition to the expections from above, the films that will never travel to Finland, or are classics too hard to find from stores or rental stores… Just some strange, great films from all over the world that I want to see, but would never be able to get from anywhere. I could try Amazon or Play.com, but I’ve decided to boycott those – I just hate browsing for stuff, finding exactly what I want, and then finding out that ”this product can’t be delivered to your country”. Makes me feel like Finland is in some sort of a third-world commercial blockage…

So again, a lot of money lost, and now the so-called ”long tail” gets the hit. The smaller, international filmmakers, the ones that I’d loved to support if possible. And it’s not.

Given these facts, am I a criminal? I would’ve wanted to pay for the films I watch, but it just was completely impossible for me at the level of effort I was willing to put into it.

So it’s like I’m driving a car on a long and lonesome highway, about run out of fuel. I stop by at a gas station, fill the tank, and when going inside to pay, there’s completely nobody, doors are locked and the station is dead because the gas station owner just didn’t feel like coming to work today. I’m not going to just sit around and wait for the owner to show up. If my money is not good for the owner, then I’m off, fuck him.

I don’t believe that digital sharing and distribution of films is piracy, and criminal action as such. It’s just a byproduct of the corporate-controlled industry that’s too slow to adapt, and consumers – the people who LOVE the stuff the corporates are producing – shouldn’t be the ones that take the hit.

EDIT: I just received a funny email, which says:

helpcinema.eu invites you to participate in an online petition against illegal file sharing.

Helpcinema is an initiative taken by European film professionals to collect your reactions regarding the effects of illegal file sharing on the audio-visual industry. This input will be used to give European Members of Parliament a new perspective on the subject.

You can easily participate by answering our three-step questionnaire available here. Your e-mail address will be kept confidential.

If you love cinema and if you have an opinion to share, please show your support and send us your feedback.

So go over to helpcinema.eu and share your thoughts. Not surprisingly, I answered ‘no’ three times.

-Timo

Zombie Room Review: Che (2008)

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

zombieroom_reviewI saw both Che: Part One and Che:Part Two in a row. For me it was important to see them together so I waited for the release of the second one. In this review I will be talking about both films more or less as a one.

The film is directed by Steven Soderbergh. He has an ability to joggle between big budget movies and small indie films without even breaking a sweat. Although he is not the safest bet, Soderberg has done quite a few amazing movies in the past like my absolute favorite Sex, Lies, and Videotape. He has always had a spesific way of telling stories trough his lens, all clearly influenced by cinema of the 70´s. When I went to see Che I was expecting more of the indie qualities to resurface, as they did, but I was blown away on how “arty” the film actually was. No, arty is not the right word, let´s say challenging.

che_1

STORY

The film itself is separated in two parts, each of them being a little over two hours long. In the first part we discover Ernesto “Che” Guevaras earlier years with Fidel Castro and his revolution in Cuba. Set in 1956, Che and a band of Castro-led Cuban exiles mobilize an army to topple the regime of dictator Fulgencio Batista.

The second part is set years later in 1966, when Che has left his family and countrymen in Cuba and gone to Bolivia, to to start another revolution. There he lives his life in disguise. This time the revolutionarys are not that revolutionary and everything goes to hell in the end. The movie is mostly set in forests and it consentrates on showing what being a guerilla or a true revolutionary really means. It basically means little or no food, being on the mercy of the weather and just waiting around in the woods doing nothing, with the ocational gun fights and blowing things up bits.

Che is unique in the sence that there is nothing glamorous about it and it definitely doesn´t glorify the revolutionaries or even the ideals. It just is what it is.The film format itself is very demanding and it doesn´t underestimate the audience, not at all. This I thought was especially good about the movie. After seeing the movie, I felt almost proud of seeing it. The film really made me think about the modern cinema and how easy everything has been made to the audience these days.

1135243851276

CAST & CHARACTERS

Che has an amazing cast and I don´t mean it like it would be packed with Hollywood A-listers. In fact it is the exact opposite. Of course we have the amazing Benicio Del Toro in one the best performances of his life, but other than that the cast is very unkown. Well Matt Damon is in the film for 5 minutes and Franka Potente has a smallish role but that´s it. Demián Bichir is playing Fidel Castro and he is absolutely perfect for the role. Not only is he the spitting image of a young Castro, he is also a great actor and gives an amazing perfomance. You almost feel bad that you don´t get to see him trouhg the whole film. There is not even one bad performances in Che, the casting is just perfect in every possible way.

One of the most interesting directorial choices in the movie was the distance that was kept from the main character Che. You would imagine that a film maker would want to revile some things about the iconic person and bring depth to the charecter, but not Soderberg. I didn´t have that much trouble with this, because I think Soderberg wanted to maintain Ches symbolic and iconic status, much like that famous picture. Only problem with this kind of story telling is that you don´t feel very much emotion, fear or love for your character.

che-movie_357x528

GENERAL BABLE

I spesifically want to give extra credit to Soderberg for doing this movie in the original languages. This almost never happens with American cinema. Everyone speaks English everywhere. Or even worse, they speak english with fake accents. I hate that by the way! I think the only one who has done it succesfully is Steven Spielberg in for example Schindler’s List. People actually have their own languages all over the world, so why not speak them. Most American´s won´t read subtitles and even the notion of something foreing makes them run. Too bad for the rest of the world…

I do have to say that it is a miracle that Soderberg has ever gotten the green light for this project. Don´t get me wrong, I liked it very much, but this movie is NOT for the masses. In fact the film has flopped quite badly everywhere. I´m not surprised. The film is allot to take in, but it is also one of the most interesting ones I´ve seen in while. But I still think it is a damn shame that people don´t seem to be very open for different things.

review-che

CONCLUSION

Negatives:

- Matt Damon (he is in the film only 5 minutes, but still)

- There was something weird in the use of music

- Ok, it was a little boring.

Positives:

- Cast (especially Benicio Del Toro and Demián Bichir)

- Language (all original languages, you don´t see that too often)

- Locations (beautiful and ugly at the same time, felt really genuaine)

- Realism (realism is boring, and so was this film at times, but that is real)

che

Che is a very good movie. It is not your typical biopic, it is raw, honest and demanding. My advice to everyone is to go see the both parts in the same day. I kown allot of people who are still wondering if they shoud go see it, to them I say YES if you want to be challenged to something different and NO if you don´t.

- Essi

Related Posts with Thumbnails